THE BOUNDARIES OF COMPASSION, pt.2

15 04 2018

In a post a couple of months ago, I wrote about a dustup I was having with some old friends over Caitlin Johnstone’s posts, “Please,, Just Bleeping Die Already” and its follow-up, “Good,” written after McCain had been diagnosed with brain cancer. My friends were horrified that she seemed to be wishing death on someone, even a bloodthirsty maniac like McCain. I thought Ms. Johnstone’s view might fall under the rubric of “radical compassion,” doing whatever it might take to keep him from doing more damage (after all, hurting other people hurts oneself, as well), and decided to ask the opinion of a person I regard as an authority on what is, and is not, compassionate. After that conversation, I communicated with Ms. Johnstone, and on those bases, here is my response to my friends in that discussion group.

First, I want to lay out some context for the statement that “Caitlin Johnstone wishes John McCain was dead.” Here are a few statements that I think fall into the same category as this allegation about her. Read the rest of this entry »

Advertisements




LARRY NASSAR AND THE BOUNDARIES OF COMPASSION

18 02 2018

Even in the midst of a veritable avalanche of revelations of sexual predation, the case of Larry Nassar sticks out like a gaping, bleeding wound. It’s not just that he took advantage of his position as US Olympic Gymnastics Team doctor to use the bodies of young girls as objects in his sexual fantasies. It’s not just that, apparently, a whole lot of the officials involved with him knew what he was doing, and chose to ignore it. It’s that, in our culture, the objectification of female bodies is, in many ways, the norm, so that, viewed from a certain perspective, what he was doing was not so far out of the ordinary. Our commercial culture uses sexually attractive women’s bodies as a lure to sell things to men, and as a way to shame women, deny their worth, and guilt-trip them into buying things that will, supposedly, make them more worthy. In this world of women-as-objects, sex becomes detached from emotional intimacy. “Sex robots” seem like a reasonable use of technology….hey, they’re just the ultimate sex toy, right? This objectification, and consequent alienation, is a symptom of the normalization of sociopathy in our culture.

not the real thing…just a fantasy

People are rightly horrified by Nassar and what he has done. The father of one of his victims attempted to assault him in the courtroom. He will not be the last person to do so. Child molesters are the very bottom of the social ladder in prison, and often meet violent ends. Whatever thrills Mr. Nassar got from taking advantage of the young girls with whom he was entrusted, he will be paying for them dearly.

But our culture has plenty of Larry Nassars  who have figured out socially acceptable ways to victimize innocent people. I want to examine the case of one man in particular, a man whose initial way of molesting women and children was to drop bombs on them. He didn’t know the children he killed and wounded. He didn’t even see them. He was killing people for what he considered a higher purpose, so that the country he lived in would prevail against the country whose women and children he was killing. Read the rest of this entry »





SETH RICH–THE MYSTERY CONTINUES

27 06 2017

August 7, 2017 update:

The story about Faux news making up quotes they attributed to “FBI agents” has been all over the news lately, repeating the claim that “this was an armed robbery gone wrong.” What has barely been in the news is the investigation by Ray McGovern and Veteran Intelligence Professionals For Sanity, which involved “a forensic analysis of the metadata for the DNC’s computer server” and concluded that

on July 5, 2016, data was leaked (not hacked) by a person with physical access to DNC computers, and then doctored to incriminate Russia.

After examining metadata from the “Guccifer 2.0” July 5, 2016, intrusion into the DNC server, independent cyber investigators have concluded that an insider copied DNC data onto an external storage device, and that “telltale signs” implicating Russia were then inserted.

Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying and doctoring were performed on the East Coast of the U.S.

The article goes on to sketch out a rationale that explains why this was most likely done by a DNC insider, and not a Russian mole in the DNC. That story is beyond the scope of this one, and well told my Mr. McGovern. Its significance for this story is, obviously, that the DNC material was definitely leaked, not hacked. And, on reflection, I have understood that his parents may well be right, that Seth could not have been the leaker. He might simply have had the misfortune of knowing who the leaker was.

I certainly hope we find out the truth of this matter, along with a great many of its corollaries.

(This post has been edited and expanded slightly since I first posted it, since it has become part of my July radio show.)

I have a bit of a backlog of “must-read” links. By the time some of them reach the light of day, they are no longer relevant, because things can change a lot in a month. So, after reading Caitlin Johnstone​’s late-May piece “Someone Just Edited Seth Rich’s Reddit Posts,” I checked to see if there was any reliable more recent information that might help me determine whether the post was still noteworthy, or not.

After skipping over various right-wing sources that did not feel I could trust, I found a Newsweek article titled “Seth Rich Update: DNC Staffer Murdered by Serial Killer, Not in Botched Robbery, Report Claims.” The title, however, proved to be somewhat misleading, as I found when I read the article, which quoted a police report that said  “death was more likely committed by a hired killer or serial murderer.”

The article also cites a report by a group called “The Profiling Project,” which points out

“The murderer brought a most likely unregistered firearm to the crime scene, utilized the firearm and most likely carried the firearm away from the crime scene….That the crime scene appeared to be almost sanitized (no firearms casings were reported to be found, no physical evidence was reported), and that there does not appear to be excessive use of force (as only two shots were reported), the offender does not appear to be psychotic.”

Verrry interesting. Soon, however, “The Profiling Project” starts to spin the information. In this next quote, the first sentence is a reasonable statement, the second spins the facts, and the third deposits us in what looks to me like disinformation territory.

Read the rest of this entry »








%d bloggers like this: