1 11 2015

First, a short news article from Democracy Now:

…in New Hampshire, an intruder armed with a hatchet was caught inside a Planned Parenthood clinic early Wednesday morning after smashing computers, furniture, plumbing fixtures, medical equipment, windows and walls. The Claremont clinic, which provides a range of services, but not abortions, was spray-painted with the word “murderer” earlier this month.

The perpetrator turned out to be a teenager.  In Israel, the police routinely shoot Palestinian teenagers who act like that.  They call them “terrorists.” So….sure, the vandalism in New Hampshire was just plain stupid, but isn’t it also “terrorism”? And, if it’s ” terrorism,” shouldn’t those who incited it be prosecuted along with the perp? I’m looking at you, Republicans andFaux News.

Planned Parenthood has not done anything illegal or unethical, but it has been condemned in the court of right-wing opinion, and legislatures across the country are effectively vandalizing the organization by cutting off state funding, eliminating a whole spectrum of health care services for low-income women.

They claim they’re doing this in the name of “Christianity,”a religion whose holy book says:

Read the rest of this entry »


11 09 2009

I have been pretty hard on Barack Obama–although if Sarah Palin had become vice president, I might have chosen to relocate to Canada for my personal safety–but we all knew that wasn’t going to happen, not once Goldman-Sachs threw down for Obama.

A friend of mine is (or used to be) close to Al Gore, who confided in him as he was about to become Vice-President that he thought he really wouldn’t be able to implement much of his political vision because the President and Vice President are little more than figureheads, who have to deal with firmly entrenched political realities.  Al was right, all too right–from NAFTA to welfare to the Middle East to global warming to the so-called “war on Drugs,” the Clinton-Gore years  at best were a stumble in place and at worst took us way on down the wrong road.

That’s the context in which I see Obama’s movement from an enthusiastic endorser of single-payer health care, to his acknowledgement that, while it makes the most sense, it’s not possible in the arena of American politics, any more than prosecuting Cheney and Bush for war crimes or prosecuting Tim Geithner and the rest of the Wall Street Wolves for economic crimes.  It’s their economy and they’ll trash it if they want to.

I am amazed that a President who has indebted the public up to our hairline in order bail out private enterprise gone bad is accused of being a socialist, but that just goes to show you how ignorant a lot of people really are.  There are loads of paranoid nut jobs in this country who would raise hell if  Bush and Cheney got their due, and all these same ignorant, neurotic people will not let the government go after our vampiric medical establishment and its vicious brother, the convenience food industry.  Like, “I’ll give up my Big Mac when you pry it from my cold, dead hands!”  Probably sooner, rather than later, if the mortality statistics mean anything.  But I digress….

The firmly entrenched political reality in America is that establishing a single-payer health care system, no matter how much sense it makes economically and socially, is a non-starter.  This country is too much in thrall to big money, and big money is not going to go away or commit suicide, at least not fast enough to make a difference.  And so Obama’s “public option” was meant to be a small experiment that, if it worked, would grow–but then Congress, specifically the “Blue Dog” Democrats like Nashville’s own Jim Cooper–messed with the public option, and, unless it gets changed back, they pretty much disabled it.  As originally formulated, this “public insurance” would have paid doctors 5% more than Medicare pays; but the Blue Dogs, supposed financial conservatives, insisted that the “public option” pay doctors and hospitals a negotiated fee that will, in all likelihood, keep it from being significantly cheaper than private insurance.

So, when Obama, after doing a great job of describing the knot our for-profit medical system has tied us in, started proposing his “solution,” it made about as much sense as bailing out the banks for screwing us over.  We, the taxpayers, are going to be asked to bail out the insurance companies for screwing us over, and it’s very likely that the bill that eventually emerges from Congress will do little or nothing to help people who are going bankrupt over their medical bills in spite of being insured.  It will certainly do nothing to eliminate the bureaucratic  labyrinth that consumes enough of our health care dollars to cover the cost of  a single-payer system.  It will do nothing to cap or reduce medical costs, or the cost of insurance, or the cost of pharmaceutical drugs.  It will do nothing to educate people about how to eat right and exercise right so as not to get sick in the first place.  It will be a bonanza for the private, for-profit insurance companies, who do not need a bonanza.  They need to be busted, but it ain’t gonna happen on Obama’s watch.  It’s as if Teddy Roosevelt had let himself be intimidated by Standard Oil.  Shame on you, Mr. Obama.  You may not be a “blue dog” Democrat, but you are definitely a “yellow stripe” Democrat.

In a recent article in The New York Times, Michael Pollan points out that

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, three-quarters of health care spending now goes to treat “preventable chronic diseases.” Not all of these diseases are linked to diet – there’s smoking, for instance – but many, if not most, of them are.

We’re spending $147 billion to treat obesity, $116 billion to treat diabetes, and hundreds of billions more to treat cardiovascular disease and the many types of cancer that have been linked to the so-called Western diet. One recent study estimated that 30 percent of the increase in health care spending over the past 20 years could be attributed to the soaring rate of obesity, a condition that now accounts for nearly a tenth of all spending on health care.

Mr. Obama’s rhetoric was soaring, and he got most of the important facts right.  But his solution is as effective as a band-aid on a gunshot wound.  If this bill passes, even with its so-called “public option” intact, it will be yet another reminder that our government, no matter which major party is in charge, no matter how good its proclaimed intentions, is completely incapable of acting to benefit “we, the people.”

music:  Cream, “Politician


8 08 2009

I am not a big fan of Sonya Sotomayor. I appreciate the fact that she comes  from a lower-class, ethnic background, but I don’t give her points for being a Hispanic woman–hey, Eva Peron was a Hispanic woman, y’know?  From what I can understand of her legal career, she is not going to rock the boat.  She has tended to rule in favor of corporate rights over individual rights, and, after all, George Bush Sr. was the President who first nominated her to the federal bench–albeit at the prompting of Democratic Senator Patrick Moynihan.

What has really struck me about her nomination is the bizarre behavior of those who oppose her.  I think this points up a major divide in America’s consciousness, and speaks directly to the reasons why we are having such a hard time doing the right thing–this is deeper than mere corporate malfeasance and money addiction, this gets to why people are such suckers for that bait in the first place.

What really brought this home to me was the attitude of Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions.  In his own words:

I will not vote for—no senator should vote for—an individual nominated by any President who believes it is acceptable for a judge to allow their own personal background, gender, prejudices, or sympathies to sway their decision in favor of, or against, parties before the court.

In my view, such a philosophy is disqualifying.

Such an approach to judging means that the umpire calling the game is not neutral, but instead feels empowered to favor one team over the other.

Call it empathy, call it prejudice, or call it sympathy, but whatever it is, it is not law. In truth it is more akin to politics. And politics has no place in the courtroom.

Two things struck me about Sessions’ statement.  The first was his assumption that a human being could not bring their own “personal background, gender, prejudices, or sympathies” to whatever they were doing, whether it’s being a Supreme Court Justice or being a shoemaker.  Unless you happen to be enlightened, a condition almost certainly not predominant in either Ms. Sotomayor or Mr. Sessions, your “personal background, gender, prejudices, (and) sympathies” is pretty much who you are, and in the rare and wonderful event that you are enlightened, that enlightenment will still manifest itself through the unique lens of your “personal background, gender, prejudices, (and) sympathies.”  Wow, how did I get from politics to enlightenment?   That “Deep Green Perspective,” gotta love it!  But, as so often happens in these monologues, I have digressed….

The second thing that struck me about Senator Sessions’ statement was a look at his record–he  was an active participant in the approval of Supreme Court Justices Roberts, Scalia, and Alito, who have proved to be deeply under the sway of their own “personal background, gender, prejudices, (and) sympathies.”  More on that in a minute.  Here are some examples of Sessions’ own conduct that he did not consider to be the disqualifiying, undue influence of his “personal background, gender, prejudices, (and) sympathies” when he was nominated for a lower Federal court position:

…. Sessions (then a U.S. Attorney)called a white civil rights attorney who litigated voting rights cases “a disgrace to his race.” He addressed a (black) assistant U.S. attorney as “boy” and warned him, “Be careful what you say to white folks.” He admitted he thought the Ku Klux Klan was an “OK” organization until he learned that some of them smoked pot. Also, Sessions condemned the NAACP and ACLU as “un-American” and “Communist inspired,” because they “forced civil rights down the throats of people.” (thanks to for that)

He also conducted an expensive, racially tinged and racially intimidating investigation into alleged vote fraud (similar to the ACORN red herrings we still hear about) that was so thin it was thrown out by the  jury in near-record time.

Eight Senators thought that record was enough to disqualify him from a Federal judgeship.  Amazingly, six did not, but a simple majority of eight was enough to keep him off the Federal bench.  Unfortunately, it was not enough to keep him from becoming the Senator from Alabama, and his opposition to Sotomayor will probably just make him more popular with his base.  Base, indeed!

OK, back to Roberts, Scalia, and Alito,  whom Sessions feels are free of  the fault of being influenced by “personal background, gender, prejudices, (and) sympathies.”  These guys, put on the court by a crowd that alleges that it abhors “activist judges,” have repeatedly made law out of whole cloth, ignoring and overturning precedent to push a reactionary agenda that disempowers minorities, favors corporate persons over flesh and blood human beings, and removes the right of citizens to question, challenge, or even be informed about the activities of government–and big business.  Their decisions don’t make sense or have any consistency outside of solidifying and spreading the hegemony of wealthy white males, now utterly terrified by the fact that Sotomayor, a woman, with her lower-class upbringing and Hispanic roots,  is not one of them.

Of course, this panicky feeling is not limited to upper-class white men.  There are plenty of women and poor people giving their power to the aristocrats who are ruining our planet to preserve their position, and they are all growing steadily more unreasonable as their position becomes  less tenable.  We have only to look at the rambling, incoherent resignation speech of Sarah Palin, or the ignoramuses who attempted to disrupt Kathleen Sibelius’s Philadelphia town hall meeting, to see that madness is afoot in the land.  Oh, I almost forgot to mention the persistent chorus of delusionaries who insist that Barack Obama was born in Kenya and thus  is not legally qualified to be President.  When an individual gets tis out of touch with reality, we call them paranoid and disruptive and a court orders them medicated, if not outright incarcerated.  At this point, we have a whole political party behaving that way, including hundreds of judges and legislators, and the solution is not so simple.

There is a real challenge for us Greens in this mob scene.  If so many people are reacting so viscerally to a President and a health care plan that take great pains to kiss corporate ass, how could the kind of radical reform we Greens call for possibly be voted into power without provoking a coup, or at least an armed revolt?

There’s bad news, and there’s good news.  The bad news (that’s also good news, really) is that we are going to have to be very patient and persistent if we expect to make any progress in changing American politics.  We are not a mass media party, we are a personal party, a grassroots party, and what we believe and how we take care of business is something that therefore must be spread person to person, face to face.  Many who supported Barack Obama have become aware, as Bill Maher put it, that “The Democrats are the new Republicans,” and are looking for a vehicle for real change that genuinely springs from, and remains controlled by, the grass roots.  That would be the Green Party.  And some of those foaming-at-the mouth Republicans are like Paul on the road to Damascus, stretched taut between their prejudices, their neuroses, and their highest ideals, completely primed for some kind of lightning bolt to strike them and turn them around 180 degrees.  It happens.

Bob Barr, the former Georgia Congressman who kept Washington D.C. from implementing or even counting the votes for a hugely popular medical marijuana initiative, is a good example.  Once considered one of the most reactionary people in Congress, Barr now works for the American Civil Liberties Union and the Marijuana Policy Project, and supports complete withdrawal from Iraq and repeal of the Patriot Act.  Too bad he’s not in Congress any more!  I’m not saying he’s a saint–he’s a Libertarian, not a Green– but he’s definitely evolved both politically and personally, and I believe there are many more people like him.  We just need to start talking to each other, listening to each other, finding what we can agree on, and accepting each other as we are.  The alternative ends in gunfire.

music:  Richard Thompson, “You Can’t Win”

%d bloggers like this: