… the city’s largest housing development is now resident-owned, its largest supermarket is a consumer-owned cooperative, one of its largest private employers is worker-owned, and most of its people-oriented waterfront is publicly owned. Its publicly owned utility, the Burlington Electric Department, recently announced that Burlington is the first American city of any decent size to run entirely on renewable electricity.
Comments : 6 Comments »
Tags: Al Gore, Bernie Sanders, Burlington Vermont, Chuck SChumer, Civil Rights movement, Commondreams, Democratic party, Eliot Spitzer, Eugene Debs, George McGovern, Greece, Green Party, Green Party of Canada, Hillary Clinton, inconvenient truth, Israel, Joe Bageant, Liberty Union Party, New Democrats, Progressive Caucus, rahm Emmanuel, Ramparts Magazine, Rev. Martin Luther King, Rev. Martin Luther King assasination, Robert Scheer, ruling class, Scott Ritter, socialism, swiftboat, Syriza, The Clintons, Truthdig, White House
Categories : election reform, Green Party, politics
Last month, I attended a meeting called by the Nashville Peace and Justice Center, at which we “brainstormed,” as they say, on how to pursue a progressive agenda in Tennessee, given the state’s sharp tilt to the right over the last several elections. I have to say, the results were not encouraging. The old traditional tactic, “lobbying the legislature,” no longer works, and our current state government brushes off such mass demonstrations as we can muster as implacably as Qadhafi’s counterattack on the Libyan rebellion.
One call for a “mass demonstration” produced about 400 local union members and justice advocates–basically the usual suspects, from what I observed when I was there. A “statewide” gathering a couple of weeks later pulled in, I’m told, 3-4,000 people, the largest gathering of non-Chicanos to hit the state capital in quite some time, but hardly critical mass, especially since everybody went home promptly when the demo was over.
As far as the state’s Republican legislative majority is concerned, they probably could have just stayed home in the first place. The party has an agenda to pass, and they don’t intend to be swayed from it. As long-time activist Bernie Ellis has commented,
If you spend any time on the hill these days (as a few of us are), you will know that our legislature has indeed been taken over by flying monkeys. Opposing freedom of religion, dictating to local governments what protections they can extend to their citizenry (or not), creating our own Tennessee state currency — the list of anti-American lunacy goes on and on. Democratic legislators say that the Republicans are not even speaking with them anymore about any bills and (one) said to me yesterday that, in committees, Democrats are being gaveled as “out-of-order” as soon as they open their mouths. This is lawlessness of the highest order, and there is no solution available to us anymore that involves logic, rationality or politeness. The solution is in our Tennessee history books, which we should reread before this particular stain of Republicans burns them all.
(When I hear from liberals trying to work with our legislature) I am reminded of the TV commercial of the single Homo sapiens in an office full of chimpanzees. If I wanted to be around dung-slinging animals, I would go to the zoo. If I wanted to honor and observe the power and wonder of the consent of the governed, I would go to a lawfully and democratically elected legislature anywhere on this planet. These days, since the TN legislature was (s)elected by other means, it is not the place to admire democracy — it is a place to pack peanuts and wear a raincoat.
….All votes… will be strictly along party lines and anyone who doesn’t realize that by now needs to get off the kool-aid. We lost our democracy in 2008 when we allowed the Republicans to conduct “just one more” election on the DREs. If anyone wants to go to the U.S. Department of Justice (or the barricades), get in touch. If not, then have a nice life.
Thanks, Bernie, for laying it out so passionately. I’m going to spend the next few minutes elaborating on his compact commentary, which mentions a great many more issues than it explains.
Last things first–the Tennessee legislature, which happily passed a bill mandating a return to recountable ballots in 2008, continues to backpedal on that promise. Republicans are committed to the idea that switching from computer voting to paper voting will cost more money, and are using their “commitment to cut expenditures” as a reason to retain our current, unverifiable, expensive, computerized voting system. It is Bernie’s strong belief that Republicans took advantage of computerized voting to fix the last election and seize power in the state. I think this may well be the case, and Republican insistence on retaining the computer voting machines is certainly highly suspicious, given their general rejection in the US and around the world, but I also can see that the state’s rightward slide may be attributable to a reactionary trend among rural white Tennesseans and the general lameness of the state’s Democratic Party.
A Department of Justice investigation would be helpful, but, given that the Democratic Party’s lame response to the Republican Party’s pro-business offensive goes right on up the line to the DOJ and the White House, I don’t think we’ll get any clarification on this any time soon, and the question in Tennessee will continue to be “Who did your voting machine vote for?”
“The solution in the Tennessee history books” to which Bernie refers is an incident commonly known as “the battle of Athens,” in which an organized group of returning WWII vets successfully took up arms to overthrow a corrupt county government in Athens, Tennessee, shortly after the war. It’s a wonderfully romantic image, but I don’t really see it as a practical option at this point. This time around, alas, they’ve got the guns AND the numbers. We are in the same position as the Good Government in Gomorrah party, but, unlike Lot, we can’t just leave, because nearly the whole country, and most of the world, is in no better shape than we are here. We’re gonna have to ride it out where we are.
As for general lunacy and dung-slinging, here’s a short list: the “anti-Sharia” law, revocation of collective bargaining for Tennessee teachers, unilateral abrogation of the national health care bill, a proposal to limit cities’ ability to enact local anti-discrimination, fair wage, and zoning laws, a state constitutional amendment forbidding an income tax, a proposal that the state issue its own currency…this is getting to be a long “short list.”
“Sharia(h), as defined and understood by traditional and authoritative sharia scholars and leaders, is a legal-political-military doctrinal system combined with certain religious beliefs; further, sharia is based historically and traditionally on a full corpus of law and jurisprudence termed fiqu and usul al-fiqh, respectively, dealing with all aspects of a sharia(h)-adherent’s personal and social life and political society.”The bill also states that Shariah “requires all its adherents to actively and passively support the replacement of America’s constitutional republic, including the representative government of this state with a political system based upon sharia(h).”
The bill would give Tennessee’s attorney general the power to designate an organization as “a Shari’a organization,” and forbid individuals from giving support to such an organization. Since our state government has already been the source of a complaint calling Bernie Ellis a terrorist, this does not bode well for any of us whose politics are in any way left of center. The legislation seems to conflate “shari’a” and “terrorism,” which is simply incorrect. Shari’a is the Islamic version of Judaism’s Talmud, a long and constantly evolving discussion of how professing a certain religious faith applies to one’s daily life.
In the same vein, many Christians look to the Bible for guidance, and if you’re looking for something scary, the idea of Biblical religious law is at least as scary as anything in shari’a. Everybody knows about the famous “what’s a good price for my daughter/why can’t I own a Canadian?” letter, but that only scratches the surface. If Christians are serious about “following the word of the Bible,” then they (and we) are going to have to take this passage seriously:
If any man take a wife, and … and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid: ….if this thing be true…. Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die. Deuteronomy 22:13-21
That’s Christian shari’a., and it isn’t purely theoretical. There are “Christian dominionists” who want to institute this kind of “Biblical law” here in America. They constitute a major component of the “Tea Party,” and they are much more numerous and active than “Islamic terrorists,” most of whom have to be recruited by the FBI. And Bill Ketron is worried about Muslims?
This is some of why our Constitution says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ….” It’s a minefield. Directing a law at shari’a without banning Talmudic studies or Christian Dominionism is plainly religious discrimination, but, as Bernie commented, our state legislators are not interested in logic–when it comes to religion, finances, or any other issue, they want it their way. Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.
While much of the state Republican Party’s agenda seems like sheer lunacy, other aspects of it are in line with the party’s national agenda, which, as Naomi Klein has commented, is an attempt to use the country’s weak financial condition as an excuse for instituting American fascism–the takeover of the government by big business interests. She calls it “The Shock Doctrine.” Of course, this has been going on for years, but it is gaining momentum, playing on people’s fears and directing their anger at phony targets–“Obamacare,” “Socialism,” “entitlement programs,” just to name a few–so that the wealthy can pick our pockets and bend the law to favor their own interests rather than the common good.
After having cast doubt on the legitimacy of state elections and the rationality of state legislators, it may seem pointless to talk about the Green Party of Tennessee and our attempts to get our party name on state ballots, but part of being the Good Government Party of Gomorrah is to act like you expect to be taken seriously, and let the chips fall where they may. To that end, I would like to let you know that we will be having our annual meeting at the Ecovillage on the Farm in Summertown, Tennessee, on the weekend of April 9-10. We will be posting details on our websites soon. Anyone who shares the Green Party’s “Ten Key Values” is welcome to attend.
The other bit of Green Party news is that a bill has been introduced into the state legislature in an attempt to respond to our court victory over the state on the ballot access question. Here’s what our lawyer, Richard Winger, has to say about it:
SB 935 would still leave Tennessee with a requirement that a minor party submit 40,042 (signatures on a petition) for the 2012 election, no later than four months before the Tennessee primary. SB 935 would still leave Tennessee with an unconstitutionally difficult law, especially given that no minor party has petitioned successfully in Tennessee since 1968.
The solution is to provide that Tennessee let newly-qualifying parties nominate by convention, something that 43 states permit. The National Civic League published “A Model Direct Primary Law” in 1951 (back then it was called the National Municipal League) and recommended that small qualified parties nominate by convention, not by primary. This saves taxpayer dollars. Tennessee permitted small qualified parties to nominate by convention until 1961, and the old pre-1961 system worked well. Letting a newly-qualifying party nominate by convention would make it possible to have a deadline that passes constitutional muster…..
Early petition deadlines, if in place in 1854, would have prevented the Republican Party from getting on the ballot. The Republican Party was founded on July 6, 1854, and it went on to win a plurality in the US House of Representatives in the autumn 1854 election. Back then there were no government-printed ballots, and therefore no ballot access laws. But if there had been ballot access laws, a petition deadline earlier than summer would have stopped the birth of a very important new political party. I hope you amend SB 935 so that it is more like SB 617, a bill by Senator Campfield that lets newly-qualifying parties nominate by convention, so that the petition deadline is later in the year. Thank you.
How cool to find a way to pitch it to Republicans, Richard!
So there it is…and bizarrely enough, it’s Stacey Campfield, whom I have berated in these pages before, who is working to do the right thing. Goes to show, you don’t ever know, eh?
Well, if it’s all rigged, maybe having the Green, Libertarian, and Constitution parties on the ballot will just give the puppet masters more columns into which to shunt would-be Democrat votes. Or maybe it will be a genuine step toward broadening the political discussion in this state. My choice is to act in good faith and presume that everybody else is, too–but watch each card and play it slow.
music: Grateful Dead, “Deal”
Comments : 8 Comments »
Tags: Battle of Athens, Bernie Ellis, Bible, Bill Ketron, Christian Dominionists, Constitution, democrats, kEcovillage at the Farm, Naomi Klein, Nashville Peace and Justice Center, Obamacare, Republicans, Richard Winger, Sharia, Shock Doctrine, socialism, Stacey Campfield, Talmud, tea-party, Ten Key Values, Tennessee legislature, touch-screen voting, US Department of Justice
Categories : censorship, election reform, Green Party, health care, local politics, politics, social issues
When I read about the shenanigans perpetrated by the Republican Party lately, I don’t just wonder “What are they thinking?” I wonder if they are thinking at all, or if they are merely DNA-powered robots in an extremely reactonary, defensive response to the fact that everything that has ever given them security and a sense of self is vanishing like smoke.
There’s plenty of evidence that there is no thinking involved here, most prominently the “Obama is a Marxist/Socialist!” movement, which I commented on last month. That post, in which I decried the absurdity of calling Obama a “socialist” and pointed out some of the many ways he does the bidding of the capitalist, corporatist masters of America, prompted a reader who identified himself as “Commieblaster,” from College Road in Olive Branch, Mississippi (oh, the irony!), to comment “Obama isn’t a socialist, he’s a Marxist,” and direct me to his website, www.commieblaster.com.
Well, fair is fair. If Mr. Commieblaster is open-minded enough to read me, I owe it to him to pay a visit to his domain, and so I did. Oh, my.
“Eighty members of Congress are Socialists!” he warns. What, in his book, makes them “socialists”? Primarily, it seems, association with an organization called “Democratic Socialists of America,” whose website opens with these words:
Democratic Socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.
So….the tea partiers, who are reacting to what they perceive as an autocratic government, also feel threatened by the idea that “ordinary Americans” ought to be able to “participate in the many decisions that affect our lives”? Go figure….
DSA’s site also features a number of articles complaining about Obama’s rightward course and an interview that specifically addresses “Why Obama is Not a Socialist.” Other criteria for being a “Socialist,” according to Mr. Commieblaster, include supporting Hamas rather than Israel (which was once described as “the most socialist country outside the Eastern Bloc” and where the government still has far more influence on the private sector than in the US), and entertaining the possibility that Mumia Abu-Jamal was framed. So…does that make sense to you?
Shortly after hearing from Mr. Commieblaster, I ran across an article written by that ol’ devil Commie, the last Marxist left standing, Fidel Freaking Castro himself, in which Castro said flat out
BARACK Obama is a fanatical believer in the imperialist capitalist system imposed by the United States on the world. “God bless the United States,” he ends his speeches…..
The current administration’s militarist policies, its plunder of natural resources and unequal exchange with the poor countries of the Third World are in no way different from those of its predecessors, almost all of them extremely right-wing, with some exceptions, throughout the past century.
That’s not exactly a ringing endorsement, is it?
Perhaps Commieblaster would say that Castro is dissembling (the devil is, after all, “the father of lies”), but actions speak louder than words, and the evidence still stands that, with every move they have made, from bailing out banks in the financial crisis to promoting coal and nuclear energy development to subsidizing for-profit health insurance to creating a nationwide broadband system by helping out Comcast, the strategies that Obama and all those “socialists” in Congress have employed have propped up the capitalist system, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that highly centralized, private, for-profit systems are the least sensible, efficient, and economically viable means to promote the common good of the American people.
But I’m not going to talk about that right now. I’m going to keep examining the reactionary, right-wing mindset that looks at Democratic party corporate shills and sees Marxist-Leninists. Commieblaster is, as far as I know, just another guy on the street like me. Let’s look at what happens when the people he supports are elected to office and actually get to act on their vision.
We don’t have to look far to do that, because our own state legislature here in Tennessee is dominated by tea-party types. What have they been up to lately?
Exhibit A: A committee of the Tennessee House recently sent four bills on to the whole legislature. To quote Jeff Woods of the Nashville Scene:
Two .. measures are state constitutional amendments …to ban the individual mandate and the other to decree that the free enterprise system will live forever in Tennessee.
(The other) Two… are identical–both bills that supposedly would nullify the law’s mandate that all Americans buy insurance. There are two of these bills because their respective sponsors, Rep. Susan Lynn and Sen. Mae Beavers, are running against each other in August’s primary and anxious to take sole credit for this monumental achievement.
They all passed by voice votes to loud cheers from tea partiers…..
And…two things stand out about this example. The first is that our country’s first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, fought and won a civil war in this country over the question of whether states have the power to nullify Federal law. The decision was, they can’t do that.
Well, times have changed, you might argue. OK, how about this one: our most recent Republican administration likewise argued strongly that states did not have the power to nullify Federal law….in the words of that notorious socialist, Antonin Scalia,
The regulation of an intrastate activity may be essential to a comprehensive regulation of interstate commerce even though the intrastate activity does not itself “substantially affect” interstate commerce. Moreover… Congress may regulate even noneconomic local activity if that regulation is a necessary part of a more general regulation of interstate commerce. …The relevant question is simply whether the means chosen are “reasonably adapted” to the attainment of a legitimate end under the commerce power.
In other words, the Federal Government can tell the states to sit down and shut up.
But hey, Scalia said that in the Raich vs. Ashcroft case, which was about whether the federal government had to recognize California’s medical marijuana laws, and everybody knows that anything goes when you’re trying to stamp out the evil weed…but the Bush junta also successfully swatted down Oregon’s assisted suicide law and California’s attempts to raise mileage standards on cars. So….states can nullify federal law if Republicans want to fight the gummint, but when Democrats try to insist on states’ rights, it’s not OK. That seems to be the underlying principle here, does it not?
Exhibit B: Our state legislature has, by overwhelming majorities and without debate, passed a law requiring all medical facilities that perform abortions to post the following language prominently (in 40-point type) in their waiting rooms, or face serious fines if the signage is absent:
“Notice: It is against the law for anyone, regardless of the person’s relationship to you, to coerce you into having or to force you to have an abortion. By law, we cannot perform an abortion on you unless we have your freely given and voluntary consent. It is against the law to perform an abortion on you against your will. You have the right to contact any local or state law enforcement agency to receive protection from any actual or threatened criminal offense to coerce an abortion.”
Lawmakers soundly rejected an amendment that would have included language pointing out that it is also against the law to force anyone NOT to have an abortion. In their perception, pro-abortion pressure from Planned Parenthood and domineering husbands is much more of a threat than anti-abortion pressure from fundamentalist churches and domineering husbands. Senator Beverly Marrero, one of the only two State Senators who had the courage to vote against this bill (the other was Andy Berke), said of it
We all know this legislation is purely political, designed to increase the anti-abortion bona fides of lawmakers up for re-election this year.
I couldn’t agree with her more.
Exhibit C: My state representative’s “weekly update” informed me about HB 3280 which, to quote from the bill summary
..revises the substances that give rise to the offense described above in (1), so that it would be unlawful to operate or be in control of a motor driven vehicle while under the influence of any intoxicant, marijuana, “drug, substance or combination thereof, affecting” the central nervous system instead of a “narcotic drug or drug producing stimulating effects on” the central nervous system.”
“Any substance that affects the central nervous system”? What substance that we take into our bodies doesn’t affect our central nervous system? The bill was aimed at making it illegal to operate a motor vehicle under the influence of anything that might negatively affect a person’s judgement and response time, but, taken literally, makes it illegal to drive under the influence of coffee, food, or any of the many prescription drugs that have “do not operate heavy equipment” warnings on their labels. I take one of those, metoprolol, and I can’t say that I or anyone close to me has observed it affecting my judgement or co-ordination. Of course, this It will probably be used mostly to persecute people whose urine tests positive for marijuana, in spite of overwhelming evidence that marijuana metabolites in urine are not an indication that one is “under the influence of” marijuana, and despite research by the National Highway Traffic Safety Board that pretty well exonerates marijuana as a cause of hazardous driving.
Well, maybe I shouldn’t get my dander up too much about this, just yet. Although it passed the House unanimously, so far it’s bogged down in committee in the Senate, which is taking up more important things like allowing mountaintop removal in Tennessee, in spite of the fact that the state generates far more revenue from people coming to appreciate our scenery than it does from people destroying the scenery to pull a little coal out from under it. And that’s just one argument.
And there’s a bill that will insist that all driver’s license tests shall be conducted in English,unless the applicant’s stay in the country has been
approved and authorized by the United States department of homeland security for a specific purpose, including investing, overseeing investment, or providing needed services to companies or businesses in Tennessee, and for a specified period of authorized stay,
In other words, rich foreigners are welcome; poor ones are not. This one, too, has yet to emerge from the committee thicket, and the state’s business interests are speaking up against it, so sense may yet prevail in this case.
We also have the spectacle of our supposedly Democratic governor worrying that more people will find out they’re eligible for Medicare and sign up for it, easing their own medical expenses but increasing the state’s.
I could tell you more, but I think I have gone on just about long enough.
Into this tea party atmosphere, more reminiscent of Wonderland than Boston, strides Howard Switzer, who is once again the Green Party’s gubernatorial candidate. I wish we had a horde of people running for state legislature positions to back him up, but alas, it ain’t happening this year. You can find Howard’s blog at switzer4governor.blogspot.com/
Naomi Wolf, author of The Shock Doctrine, has found a new popularity among the tea partiers, and in a recent interview she said she has some faith that their questioning of authority will, in the long run, be beneficial. I hope she’s right. I am concerned that the tea partiers will turn out to be the 21st century version of the SA, the “brown shirts” who provided the populist muscle that brought Hitler to power and were quickly disposed of as a political force once he and his corporate conspirators consolidated their hold on Germany. On the other hand, Hitler did not have to contend with shrinking resources and a shifting climate, both forces that are more than equal to the task of toppling a civilization.
Unless they do come to their senses, the tea partiers, who seem to have the momentum in US politics at this point, will continue to spend their energy in irrelevant, illusory, paranoid pursuits, codifying intolerance and ignorance, and squashing any dissent other than their own. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.
music: Greg Brown, Worrisome Years“
Comments : 20 Comments »
Tags: abortion, Abraham Lincoln, Antonin Scalia, Barack Obama, Civil War, Congress, controlled substances, Democratic Socialists of America, drivers' license exams, Fidel Castro, Hamas, Hitler, Howard Switzer, Israel, marijuana, Medicare, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Naomi Wolf, Raich vs. Ashcroft, rea parties, Republicans, SA, Shock Doctrine, socialism, Tennessee legislature
Categories : environmental issues, Green Party, health care, local politics, politics, social issues
First, a little “I told you so.” In August of 2008, I wrote the following words:
the Repugs probably are not going to steal this election, because they would rather let the Dims be the ones to fumble around and make idiots of themselves trying to clean up the mess that eight years of out-front pillage has made of the country. It’s much easier to criticize than it is to govern, after all…I should know that!
A great many of my liberal friends are totally thrilled that a dark-skinned man with the middle name of Hussein is going to be our next President. But I think the “Hope Honeymoon” will be over mighty fast, and the next four years will be no love feast for Barack Obama or the Democrat party. While I agree that he will be a better President than John McCain, I think we are in for a long series of increasingly bitter disappointments. Let me tell you some of what I see coming down the road.
First of all, there is the misperception that Barack is a populist candidate. He makes every effort to portray himself that way. His demeanor and delivery are disarming and informal. He does not come across like a stereotypical politician, but when you read the fine print you discover that he acts like one.
He is getting the bulk of his support from Wall Street. It is good that the banking gang has recognized that the Bush Junta is not acting in their best interests, but the fact that they have settled on Obama means that he is unlikely to do the things he should to reign in big money’s influence on this country. Obama has already signaled his willingness to play along with the bankers by his support of the so-called “Class Action Fairness Act of 2005,” which severely limits the ability of private citizens, or even States, to sue corporations. The NAACP, the ACLU, and the National Organization for Women, as well as fourteen state attorneys-general, all pleaded with Congress not to pass this Republican-sponsored legislation, but Obama spoke out for it….
Well, the only part of my prediction I would disagree with at this point is the speculation that Obama is a better President than McCain would have been. It looks to me like the Repugs are so out of touch with reality that if they had taken the reins of power, we would be a lot further off the rails by now, and further into creating whatever is going to come next….yes, I know it would be draconian and tragic, but think of it as the political equivalent of ripping a band-aid off a hairy leg….do you want to go slow and agonize over the pulling of each and every individual hair, or just feel all the pain at once and yelp and get it over with?
And, certainly, the Repugs are totally stark raving batbleep crazy. The fact that so many people have fallen for the ludicrous charge that Obama’s healthcare plan, which proposes to bail out the for-profit insurance business to the tune of sixty billion dollars, is “socialist” is a symptom of serious malaise in the body politic. Obama’s proposal is basically the same plan Republican Mitt Romney instituted in Massachusetts, although Mitt drank the kool-aid and claimed in his Presidential campaign that making everybody buy private insurance was ““European-style socialized medicine.” Tell it to the Europeans!
Can you say “lacking integrity,” boys and girls?
The Romney/Obama plan does nothing to lower the exploitive rates charged by insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, or doctors who think their M.D. is a license to become a millionaire. It ain’t “socialism,” it’s a feed trough for capitalist pigs! but I digress….
I am simply amazed at how many people in this country are ignorant enough to label a corporate shill like Obama “socialist,” not to mention that many of these same people believe climate change and peak oil are fabrications for the purpose of introducing “one world government,” and are obsessing over whether Obama is really an American citizen and whether his mother was married when he was born and what they will do when he orders in UN troops in black helicopters, instead of seeking real solutions to the very real problems we face. If just a few people were babbling about these fantasies, they would be considered insane. Unfortunately, there are millions of people who share these paranoid delusions, and they are a serious political movement. This fog of unreal and groundless accusations completely distracts these people from identifying the true sources of misery and oppression in their lives, whether that’s our corporate overlords or the demons in their own heads.
Yes, the demons in their own heads. I know, this is a political rap, what am I doing talking about demons, for cryin’ out loud?
OK, demons, in this case, means neuroses, misperceptions, faulty programming like, “if you can’t control yourself, control someone else,” “the most emotional person in the room gets to run the meeting,” and other axioms of psychological power play. Does that make sense to you?
We like to pretend that we are polite and civilized and ruled by our intellects, but for most of us, that is a sham. When the pressure is on, as it is now, all that outer husk stuff blows away in the blink of an eye, and all too many of our fellow citizens revert to their inner two-year old, screaming bloody murder and falling flailing to the floor because Mommy won’t give them titty, or their favorite toy, or because it’s nap time and they’re fixated on what they’re doing but too tired to keep doing it happily. It’s no way to run a country, but it’s what we’ve got to work with.
In spite of the fact that, at least as recently as November of 2008, a sizeable majority of Americans knew that the Repugs are the problem, not the solution, the Dims have been dim enough to discourage a lot of their former supporters, who now seem amnesic enough to return the Repugs to power, in which case they will screw things up even more. Here and there, where an election is local enough so that face-to-face contact can win out over media barrages, the Green Party will make some inroads, but neither we nor anybody else with sense and solutions is likely to come to power in this country.
It’s sad and poignant. We are not only poised at the close of the American Empire, we are poised at the decline of human civilization as we have always known it. We will never again be this wealthy and this powerful. We are about to run out of cheap oil and the weather is about to go nuts, but nearly everybody is partying like the good times are going to go on forever. They’re not. The last two hundred years have been a deluded dream. We are about to be rudely awakened, and will have one mighty hangover when we come to our senses.
Comments : 6 Comments »
Tags: Barack Obama, black helicopters, capitalism, demons, insurance, John McCain, Mitt Romney, socialism
Categories : archives, climate change, environmental issues, Green Party, health care, politics, the Bush junta