SEE YOU IN COURT!

8 01 2012

Tomorrow, Monday, January 9, at 3:30 in the afternoon, I am going to be someplace I’ve never been before–inside the Federal Courtroom at the corner of Broadway and Eighth Avenue.  I’ve been outside it, involved in demonstrations, several times, but this is the first time I’m going in.  I’m not a witness or a defendant.  I’m a plaintiff, on behalf of the Green Party of Tennessee.  The State of Tennessee is the defendant, and it looks like we have them dead to rights, because we won virtually the same case once before.  We’ve just been the victim of delaying tactics by the state.  Delay, of course, is what governments and large corporations do when they’ve been caught in the wrong and don’t want to admit it.

Here’s the deal.  Way back in 2008, we filed a lawsuit alleging that Tennessee’s ballot access law, which regulates how political parties can get their names listed on the ballot, discriminates against non-duopoly parties–ones that aren’t the Republicans or the Democrats.  We knew we would win this case, because the same Federal Court in which we were suing Tennessee had just thrown out Ohio’s nearly identical, discriminatory ballot access law.

Both these laws shared the same flaws.  The first flaw was that the deadline for a party to gather signatures and get on the ballot was in March, for the November election.  The second was that the guidelines for what constituted a valid signature, or, for that matter, a valid petition, were pretty vague, and seemed to be largely left to the discretion of the Secretary of State, who, as a partisan political official, would have an interest in disqualifying any potential opposition. Another problem with the Tennessee law was that signers of the petition had to declare that they were members of the political party in question, which is a violation of personal privacy.   A fourth stickler was that, while an “independent” candidate only needs 250 signatures to get his or her name on the ballot, a political party needs the signatures of a certain percentage of the total number of voters in the most recent election–a number which currently hovers around the 40,000 mark.  Forty thousand valid signatures means eighty thousand gross signatures, a number that calls for paid professional assistance, at the rate of about two bucks per signature.  So, under Tennessee’s guidelines, it would cost a minor party about a hundred and sixty thou to get its name on the ballot.  Should the party fail to garner 5% of the vote in a statewide race, the process would need to be repeated.  The Democrats and Republicans get their party affiliation listed on the ballot for free.  A further complication is that the Tennessee law mandated that parties who came up with the required signatures then had to hold a primary election, at the same time, and in the same voting booth, as the Republicans and Democrats.  Tennessee, in case you didn’t know, has an “open primary” system–you don’t register as a member of a certain party, and, come primary day, you can walk in and ask for whichever primary ballot you feel like voting on.  Thus, by participating in this kind of free-for-all, a minor party could effectively lose control of its candidates–if a bunch of Republicans wanted to, they could vote for, say, a convicted sex offender as the Green Party’s Senate Candidate, and if enough Repubs crossed over and voted for the guy, the party would be stuck with the turkey for a candidate.

I’m not making that up, either.  It actually happened in South Carolina in 2010, when an impoverished convicted sex offender mysteriously came up with the $10,000 filing fee and won the Democratic primary.  South Carolina’s primary elections, like Tennessee’s, are open.  What’s even more amazing is that, when the loser, a genuine politician (if that’s not too much of an oxymoron for you!) appealed to the state Democratic Party to redo the primary, the Dems declined to do so, and the vote wasn’t even close.  Still more amazing, this sham candidate (whose name, peculiarly enough, was “Greene”), managed to poll 28% of the vote, while a far better-qualified Green Party candidate only received 9%. It’s enough to make you wonder how many people vote in their sleep.

As I so often do, I have digressed.  As I said, we took the state to court, and the state, knowing it was caught red-handed, dragged its feet as long as it could.  We had hoped to have relief from the court in time for the 2008 election, but it didn’t happen.  Finally, in November of 2009, the case came up for a hearing, at which our plaintiff of record was first subjected to low-key torture by being denied drinking water for several hours, and then badgered on the witness stand by the state’s attorney.  Then, once again, silence, until August of 2010, when the court, of course, ruled in our favor–but too late for us to get our party name on the 2010 ballot.   Besides, through an unfortunate oversight, we hadn’t asked for “relief,” i.e., getting our party name listed with our candidates as an outcome of the court case.

But we had successfully overturned the state’s ballot access law, which meant that the legislature needed to pass a new one.  So….what did the lawmakers who had revoked the Tennessee Voter Confidence Act do?  Why, they repassed the old law, with as few changes as they could get away with.  Fewer, actually.  While they removed the privacy-violating qualification from the petition, they only moved the petition deadline back a month, which, according to legal precedent, is not sufficient, and they still insist that we nominate candidates in a primary election–which, as I pointed out earlier, effectively takes the process of candidate selection out of our hands, denying our right of free association.  It would be a little different if we were a big enough party to have competition about who got to run for various offices, but at this point, unfortunately,there are more offices to run for than there are Green Party candidates by a long shot.  In any case, the state’s denial of our right of free expression (putting our party name on the ballot along with our candidates’ names), and their denial of our right to chose our candidates in an appropriate manner are both clearly unconstitutional.  The state’s demand for 40,000 signatures is not, according to legal precedent, considered burdensome, although it sure looks that way to me, but the fact that the state has delegated definition of the guidelines for accepting those signatures as valid to the Secretary of State is, by precedent, unconstitutional.  That is why we are taking the state to court, and that is why we expect to win.

But that’s only half the battle. Let’s take a little music break, and then I’ll tell you about the other half.

music:  Bob Marley, “Get Up, Stand Up”





IN 2012, WHO WILL YOUR VOTING MACHINE VOTE FOR?

8 01 2012

As I said, getting the state of Tennessee to recognize the Green Party’s right to appear on the ballot as a party is only half the battle.  The other half involves how the votes will be cast and counted.

First, a little history.  The Cheney-Gore-Nader presidential contest in 2000 was widely perceived as having been tainted with electoral fraud that resulted in Cheney’s appointment to the Presidency by a Supreme Court largely handpicked by Ronald Reagan and his running mate’s father.  The electoral fraud most commonly suspected was not the old-fashioned, retail, the-cemeteries-arise-and-vote kind.  It was wholesale, two different ways.  The first was widespread purging of alleged felons from the voting rolls in Florida.  The key word here is “alleged.”  If you happened to have the same name as a felon, you were barred from voting, but, depending on the county you lived in and whether the list had your current address,  you might not find this out until you showed up to vote, leaving no time for an appeal.  Investigative reporter Greg Palast estimates that about 8,000 were wrongfully denied the right to vote in Florida.  Most of those on this Florida list were African-Americans, who went 9-1 for Big Al, who lost Florida (according to the Supreme Court, anyway) by just 537 votes.  The capper on this is that the “purge list,” with all its inaccuracies, was generated for the Republican-run state of Florida by a private data mining firm with close ties to the Republican Party.  So quit bashing Ralph Nader, all you Democrats–the Repubs stole this one with their own people.  If you just have to blame a fellow progressive for this screwup (which Gore compounded by refusing to contest it), blame John Hagelin, the Natural Law Party candidate, whose 2, 281 votes in Florida total more than Cheney’s alleged margin of victory.  Hagelin’s into Transcendental Meditation.  He can handle your scorn.

But I digress.  Besides wrongly disqualifying voters, there are two other easy ways to tilt the vote.  One is simply to put fewer voting machines in districts where you want fewer people to vote, because long lines will discourage some people.  This has been done with great success, most notably by Kenneth Blackwell in Ohio.  But the most sure-fire way to win an election you might lose on the up-and-up is to hack the voting machines.   This has been made much, much easier by America’s love affair with computers, because you can hack a computerized, touch-screen voting machine and leave no trace whatsoever.  This is not some crackpot theory.  Argonne National Laboratory, a division of the Department of Energy, did a little research and found that, for less than $30, they could build a remote control device that could hack into a computerized voting machine and change the results it recorded, and not leave any trace of the hack. Yes, I repeat myself, but this is very important.  Interestingly enough, these vulnerable machines are made by private corporations with close ties to the Republican Party.

All this has been well known, among those who are not totally absorbed in reality TV, anyway, for over a decade, now.  Here in Tennessee, in 2006, a group of citizens formalized their concern for the integrity of our elections by forming a group called Gathering To Save Our Democracy, to lobby for verifiable, recountable balloting in the state.  While a DRE, as computerized voting machines are referred to, can produce a printed tape showing the votes cast on it as it recorded them, there is no way to tell whether the vote recorded by the machine was the vote intended by the voter.  This is not a theoretical problem.  To give just one example, in 2004 DRE’s in New Mexico recorded a vote for Cheney when a voter pressed the “straight Republican ticket” button, but failed to record a vote for Kerry when a voter pushed the ‘straight Democratic ticket” button.  This happened almost exclusively in Latino and other low-income districts that were likely to vote Democrat.  Kerry lost the state by about 6,000 votes.  There were a reported 21,000 ballots in New Mexico on which there was no recorded Presidential vote.  Do the math!  The situation in Ohio was similar, but Kerry decided not to dispute the election, to the great disappointment of millions.

So, here in Tennessee, a group of citizens lobbied the state legislature to switch the state to some form of verifiable balloting, in which there would be a permanent record of the voter’s original intent.  Optical scan machines, the kind used to grade standard tests, were one option; hand counting was another .  Due to these citizen activists’ efforts, the state passed the Tennessee Voter Confidence Act in 2008, by a wide, bipartisan margin, with just one little compromise.  The Republican asked that implementation of the bill be delayed until the 2010 election, due to the “difficulty and expense” of switching over.  This was baloney, but the Democrats bought it, over the protests of the activists, who knew that the Republicans were, to be impolitic, lying.  Other states had made the switch in the amount of time remaining before the election, Federal money was available to pay for the transition, and it was, in fact, cheaper, faster, and simpler than using the DRE’s,   Cheaper- optical scan equipment requires only one computer per precinct, to count the ballots, which have been filled out by hand.  Old-fashioned hand-counted ballots don’t take any computer at all.  Faster–much less instruction necessary, and many more private spaces for filling out a ballot can be set up, compared to the number of computerized voting machines that can be provided at each precinct.  Simpler–as I said, little or no instruction is needed in filling out a ballot with a number two pencil.

If this is true, why did both Democrat and Republican Secretaries of State resist the change?  A two word answer:  Lobbying money.  The company invites state and county election commissioners to fancy dinners, where they are exposed to entertaining lectures on the superiority of the computerized product.  A bond is created.  Money may change hands.  While these are not elective offices, the commissioners have friends in politics whose fortunes they would like to help advance, after all.  Just another example of how decisions in this country are made not according to what makes sense, but according to what makes money for the powerful.

Once the bill was passed, with its delay in place, the 2008 election was a big surprise for Democrats, who lost heavily all over the state.  Was this a rigged election, or simply a sharp, racially-motivated right turn on the part of Tennessee voters?  It’s hard to tell–impossible, in fact, because hacking DREs leaves no traces.  The art in throwing an election is in not making it too obvious.  You don’t rig it so your guy wins 99-1; you rig it so he wins 50.1-49.9.  But first you purge the voter rolls of anyone who has something like the same name as a purported felon–if the person turns out to have merely committed a misdemeanor, or isn’t even the right person, hey, it’s their problem to prove their innocence. This is America, after all!  Then you shorten early voting  hours, which makes it a little harder for working people to vote, and then you pass a law requiring that all voters show a photo ID, which gets rid of some older, low-income voters, as well as some college students, (since you’ll accept a gun license but not a college ID as valid).  All these groups are more likely to vote for  Democrats.  Then you only have to tweak the election results a little, here and there, to throw the election.  I live in a majority black, and, obviously, heavily Democratic district.  I am reasonably certain that anybody throwing an election wouldn’t mess with our precinct, because a Republican triumph here would be hard to believe.  On the other hand, they might shave just a few votes here, and more elsewhere, where the outcome might be more up for grabs.

Back to our time line.  The newly Republican state legislature attempted to repeal the Tennessee Voter Confidence Act, but failed by one vote–that of Republican Tim Burchett, of Knoxville, who distinguished himself by being an outspoken advocate of open, honest elections.  For his principled stand, Burchett was kicked upstairs in 2010, elected to the post of Mayor of Knoxville,  With him out of the way, the legislature repealed the Tennessee Voter Confidence Act, lying through their teeth as they claimed that this was done solely because the state didn’t have the money to make the switch.  The Federal money, which was all that was required, was still sitting there, unspent.  State government firmly in hand, the Repubs have drawn up a redistricting plan that is just about guaranteed to preserve their hold on power, short of large sections of the voting public waking up to the rude, uncomfortable truth.

The situation here in Tennessee is one that, if Obama and Eric Holder had even one cojone between them, the DOJ would be all over.  But they don’t, and so I’m not looking for the guys in the white hats to come riding over the horizon any time soon.

My little rant may have raised a couple of questions for you.  You might wonder why a Green like me is being so solicitous of the welfare of our state’s Democrats. And you might wonder what, exactly, this has to do with our lawsuit, the one about recognizing Green Party candidates’ Constitutional right to have our party affiliation listed on the ballot.

I’ll answer that one first.  I am concerned that, since our elections are apparently being jiggered by the GOP, they will welcome the Green Party’s official ballot slot as a great place to dump votes they have taken away from Democrats and at the same time create strife between Greens and Democrats who perceive that we are taking “their” votes.  Even if the elections were squeaky-clean, of course, some Democrats would be squawking about this, but, if they really care about electoral choice, there are ways, such as instant runoff voting, to have elections in which voters can express their second choice in the event that their first choice doesn’t make it into the top two.

So, first question second.  Why do I, a Green,  care so much about the Democrats getting screwed over?  I could get all Martin Niemoller on you and say “First they came for the Democrats,” but it’s not really that dramatic.  While the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act is a milestone in our empire’s attempt to legitimize its war crimes, I think our government’s power will fade out long before they get around to disappearing the likes of you and me.  It’s much cheaper  and easier to just ignore us.

No, I defend Democrats, especially “rank-and-file” Democrats, because, as individuals, I like them.  Hey, I used to be one myself.  I not only like them, I am like them. They mostly mean well, unlike Republicans, who tend to be sociopaths.

Disclaimer:  what follows is strictly a metaphor.  Nobody on the Mid-Tennessee Progressive Strategies Facebook list needs to feel the least bit uneasy about my intentions there, OK?

To me, Democrats are kind of like certain fascinating and delightful women I have known, who always seemed to end up giving it to some jerk who didn’t appreciate them and made their lives miserable, rather than to me, who would have respected and appreciated them. Jerks like, back in the old days, Richard Daley, or, more recently, the likes of Steny Hoyer, Rahm Emmanuel, Joe Biden, and Max Baucus. Were those women a bit dysfunctional for the kind of love lives they manifested?   Yes, but that didn’t subtract from their lovable humanity.  Am I a bit dysfunctional, hungering for the attention of those whom I do not psycho-emotionally trigger?  Probably. But people, whether they are abused women or rank and file Democrats, sometimes grow and evolve, get to the place where they see through the games and conditioning they have always accepted, DTMFA (Dump the Mother Fucker Already) and move on.  Is that my prediction for 2012?  Do I think the ranks of the Green Party will swell with masses of disaffected Democrats?  I’m not getting my hopes up, but, in the words of Shakespeare,  “‘Tis a consumation devoutly to be wished.”

music:  Drive-By-Truckers, “Wife Beater





F-BOMBING AMERICAN POLITICS

8 01 2012

Please note:  I’m going to drop a lot of f-bombs in this segment and the next.  In politics, however, the f-word that is not spoken in polite society has nothing to do with plowing or the union of male and female.  In politics, the f-word that should never be uttered is “fascism.”  I’m going to utter it frequently over the next couple of segments, so don’t say I didn’t warn you.

For the first time in a while, I’ve got a “truth in strange places” award to mention,  but first, I want to give a “truth tellers in strange places” award–to Bradley Manning, for showing the world the dirty linen of the American Empire, sowing the seeds of Arab Spring, and spawning the “Occupy” movement here in America, a movement that has only begun to come into its stride.  The mills of the gods grind slow, but exceeding fine, and have only just barely caught the shirt-tails of the elite in their inexorable grasp.  As William Kunstler likes to say, “it’s going to be a great show from the cheap seats.” And here we are, and no wonder the gummint is so mad at the man.

So yes, Bradley Manning gets the “Truth-Tellers in Strange Places” award.  Corporal Manning should be up for a Nobel Peace Prize, but instead, he has spent nearly a year and a half in prison before even having any charges brought against him.  During this time, he has been repeatedly humiliated, kept in solitary confinement, and probably drugged .  Two thoughts come to mind:  one is that if this is what our government will do without the recent detention provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act, what will it feel emboldened to do with that permission?

The other thought is that the government wants to make damn sure nobody else gets any noble ideas about following the path blazed by Daniel Ellsburg, who became a folk hero for leaking “The Pentagon Papers,” which, like Mr. Manning’s alleged gifts to Wikileaks, gave the lie to America’s loudly proclaimed noble intentions. Sibel Edmonds is another great American whistle blower, but, unlike Ellsberg and Manning’s cases, her revelations were largely ignored by the complacent mass media of the early aughts.  Since then, the internet’s ability to spread a story widely without benefit of the so-called mainstream media has grown exponentially, so that, even though the U.S. can hobble Wikileaks financially, it has been unable to shut it down or stop the truth from being told. For all his campaign promises about hope, change, and openness, Obama has been even harsher than his predecessors when it comes to prosecuting whistle blowers instead of listening to them.

Here’s hoping 2012 is the year when Bradley Manning soon receives the hero’s welcome he deserves.

Our “Truth in Strange Places” award goes to Dr. Ron Paul, who should need no introduction.  No matter what you think of the full spectrum of his politics, no matter whether or not you trust that he has moved beyond the simple-minded racism published in his name twenty years ago, he is the only Presidential candidate who actually challenges the status quo in any way.  His ad asking people to imagine the American response to a Chinese or Russian military base in Texas puts the shoe on the other foot in a way that nobody else in the race had the vision, brains, or nerve to do, and it’s too bad that it, and the warning it carries about blowback from American imperialism, will likely not be appreciated until foreign drones cruise American skies and Americans are “specially rendered” for crimes against the Chinese or Russian state. Paul’s willingness to admit that the “War on Drugs” is an extremely costly failure is another breath of fresh air, but, beyond that, Paul actually turns out to be cut from the same cloth as the rest of the Republican pack, whom he joins in calling for the radical downsizing of the U.S. government and the unleashing of corporate power.

Downsizing and muzzling the U.S. government is not actually an issue between the Dems and Repubs, although both like to pretend it is.  The Democratic leadership, just as much as the Republicans, is committed to serving corporate interests first, and the public second.  That is why nobody central has been prosecuted for the Wall Street meltdown, why banks have gotten trillions in relief while foreclosed homeowners and the unemployed have received only table scraps, why, instead of a genuine overhaul of our so-called health care system, we got a law mandating that we buy health insurance from the companies who have helped make the U.S. health care system the most expensive and dysfunctional in the world, not to mention one of the chief conduits for channeling the wealth of the American middle class into corporate coffers.  Corporatism is the latest evolution of the political “F-word”: fascism.  In a corporatist/ fascist political system, the government exists to serve the needs of corporations, to encourage the people to be submissive, because, “What is good for General Motors” (or any other “too-big-to-fail” corporation) is good for America.”  You know, “the trickle-down theory.”

So, what is the likely choice the Democrats and Republicans will give American voters this year?  In the words of Glenn Greenwald, an Obama supporter will have to think:

Yes, I’m willing to continue to have Muslim children slaughtered by covert drones and cluster bombs, and America’s minorities imprisoned by the hundreds of thousands for no good reason, and the CIA able to run rampant with no checks or transparency, and privacy eroded further by the unchecked Surveillance State, and American citizens targeted by the President for assassination with no due process, and whistleblowers threatened with life imprisonment for “espionage,” and the Fed able to dole out trillions to bankers in secret, and a substantially higher risk of war with Iran (fought by the U.S. or by Israel with U.S. support) in exchange for less severe cuts to Social Security, Medicare and other entitlement programs, the preservation of the Education and Energy Departments, more stringent environmental regulations, broader health care coverage, defense of reproductive rights for women, stronger enforcement of civil rights for America’s minorities, a President with no associations with racist views in a newsletter, and a more progressive Supreme Court.

We can choose the lesser of two evils–or refuse to choose evil at all.  That’s why the Green Party runs Presidential candidates, at this point–not because we have any hope of winning, but to give people of conscience a real choice.  I have many friends who tell me it is pragmatic, even principled, to vote for the lesser of two evils.  Maybe it’s right for them.  I just know that I couldn’t look myself in the mirror if I knew I had voluntarily supported evil, lesser or not.

The Clash, “Spanish Bombs

Let’s have an “Alice in Wonderland” moment:

When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
    “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
    “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master      that’s all.”

Now, let’s jump about a hundred and thirty years closer to the present with this quote from political writer Ron Suskind.  Formerly a reporter for the Wall Street Journal, he is certainly no flaming radical, and unlikely to have made this up:

The aide(probably Karl Rove) said that guys like me were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” … “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” 

Am I alone in seeing a parallel between the words of Humpty Dumpty and the words of Karl Rove?

Let’s talk for a while about this business of shrinking the government and letting private industry grow, to which the Dems and Repubs both seem committed. It ties in with the Republican assault on labor unions.  The purpose of unions and the purpose of democratic government are the same—a way for people to join together to deal with something bigger than an individual human, whether the bigger thing is an invasion, a natural disaster, a need to maintain the commons—or a large, possibly multi-national, corporation. Those who call for the shrinking of the state and the destruction of labor unions, but do not at the same time call for diminishing the power of the corporate sector, are not populists, as they like to style themselves. They are fascists.  Fascism always seeks, in the name of the people, to shrink the power of the people and grow the power of the elite.

In the words of FDR,

“The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism — ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.”

As I understand Roosevelt’s words, and as I understand what’s going on in America today, we have slid far down the road to fascism.

Another front on which the GOP has pushed inequality has been their sometimes successful attempts to disempower women by limiting their access to health care, contraception, and abortion, even in the context of rape and incest.  I don’t have enough time tonight to give you the nasty details of this, but you can read the whole rap sheet at this link.  This is a rich subject, and I may do a whole story on in next month.

Here’s my take on the contest for the Republican nomination:  The GOP’s kingmakers will never, ever let Ron Paul anywhere near the Presidency, and, indeed, most Republicans are far too hypnotized to ever accept him.  Mitt Romney will likely be the nominee.  Because Romney’s Mormon faith is so distasteful to the party’s evangelical wing, who largely consider Mormonism a pagan religion, Rick Santorum or someone like him will get the VP slot, so as to bring in the faithful, just as Sarah Palin served John McCain in the last round.

This ticket is still extremely problematic.  First of all, Romney carries the baggage of having designed the program Republicans now revile as “Obamacare,” and it will be funny to watch him try and shake that one off.  Second, for all the GOP’s touting of the uber-wealthy as “job creators,” Romney made a whole lot of his uber-wealth in the 80′s running a firm, Bain Capital,  that bought American companies and slimmed or shut them down, or moved them overseas, reaping enormous benefits for CEO’s and investors, and disaster for working Americans.

And Santorum?  Back in the 1930′s, Sinclair Lewis said, ” “When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”  Rick Santorum is the guy wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross.  In his own words:

We have laws in states, like the one at the Supreme Court right now, that has sodomy laws and they were there for a purpose. Because, again, I would argue, they undermine the basic tenets of our society and the family. And if the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. Does that undermine the fabric of our society? I would argue yes, it does. It all comes from, I would argue, this right to privacy that doesn’t exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution, this right that was created, it was created in Griswold—Griswold was the contraceptive case—and abortion. And now we’re just extending it out. And the further you extend it out, the more you—this freedom actually intervenes and affects the family. You say, well, it’s my individual freedom. Yes, but it destroys the basic unit of our society because it condones behavior that’s antithetical to strong healthy families. Whether it’s polygamy, whether it’s adultery, where it’s sodomy, all of those things, are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family….. society is based on the future of the society. And that’s what? Children. Monogamous relationships. In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That’s not to pick on homosexuality. It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be.

Another example of Rick’s rhetoric:

“One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is, I think, the dangers of contraception in this country.  Many of the Christian faith have said, ‘Well, that’s okay. Contraception is okay.’ It’s not okay. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”

Folks, this kind of talk is straight out of the Nazi playbook.  He wants to put the government in your bedroom to make sure you don’t use birth control or do anything he thinks is kinky, because sex is for reproductive purposes only, dammit.  Why is it so much fun, then?  That’s the Devil tempting you to self -indulgence!

bUT….while Santorum makes pronouncements that warm the hearts of conservative evangelical Christians, he himself is actually a Catholic.  Will evangelicals give it up for a pagan and a papist?  Or dredge up the just-as-batshit-crazy/sexually repressed. but thoroughly Protestant, Michelle Bachman?  Or find some other Stepford wife/husband?

So that’s the choice America faces in 2012–between Obama, a whore for the corporatists, and Romney/Santorum or his equivalent, a corporatist pimp and a narrow-minded, repressed bigot.  Or, there’s kicking over the table, which may become more and more likely as more and more Americans realize, with Tim DeChristopher,

Once I realized that there was no hope in any sort of normal future, there’s no hope for me to have anything my parents or grandparents would have considered a normal future—of a career and a retirement and all that stuff—I realized that I have absolutely nothing to lose by fighting back. Because it was all going to be lost anyway.

But he worked through his despair:

“How the hell could people accept this? This is outrageous.” And I think that’s one of the things that the wilderness does for us, you know, it allows us to live the way we actually want to live for a while. It puts things in the perspective of, “Wait, this isn’t inevitable. It doesn’t actually have to be this way. And this isn’t the way I want to live. It’s not okay.” I think activism at its best is refusing to accept things. Saying that this is unacceptable.

With or without access to the wilderness that healed and nurtured Tim DeChristopher, he is far from the only person coming to the twin realizations that the current situation is totally unacceptable, and he has nothing to lose in opposing the corporatocracy–or creating something different that meets genuine human–and planetary–needs.

You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.





THE LOW ROAD

8 01 2012

I’m going to conclude with this Marge Piercy poem, musical background is “Black Dust” by Bill Laswell from his AFTERMATHematics instruMENTAL album

The Low Road

What can they do
to you? Whatever they want.
They can set you up, they can
bust you, they can break
your fingers, they can
burn your brain with electricity,
blur you with drugs till you
can t walk, can’t remember, they can
take your child, wall up
your lover. They can do anything
you can’t blame them
from doing. How can you stop
them? Alone, you can fight,
you can refuse, you can
take what revenge you can
but they roll over you.

But two people fighting
back to back can cut through
a mob, a snake-dancing file
can break a cordon, an army
can meet an army.

Two people can keep each other
sane, can give support, conviction,
love, massage, hope, sex.
Three people are a delegation,
a committee, a wedge. With four
you can play bridge and start
an organisation. With six
you can rent a whole house,
eat pie for dinner with no
seconds, and hold a fund raising party.
A dozen make a demonstration.
A hundred fill a hall.
A thousand have solidarity and your own newsletter;
ten thousand, power and your own paper;
a hundred thousand, your own media;
ten million, your own country.

It goes on one at a time,
it starts when you care
to act, it starts when you do
it again after they said no,
it starts when you say We
and know who you mean, and each
day you mean one more.

–Marge Piercy
Copyright 2006, Middlemarsh, Inc.





AN AMERICAN LIFE, AN AMERICAN DEATH

9 12 2011

My old  buddy Wally died a few days after Thanksgiving.  He had just passed his 56th birthday, but his body was worn out and his spirit was worn down.  “Wally” isn’t his real name, and I have altered some of the details of his life, just to preserve what dignity he had left.  As I reflect on how he came to such a sad, lonely, and early end, I see him both as a tragically flawed human being who made a lot of stupid choices, and as a victim of our culture’s skewed priorities.  You could say he’s the liberal-conservative debate embodied in the life of one human being.

I first met Wally about twenty-five years ago, when he was just past thirty and I was thirty-seven.  You know, they say in heaven everybody is thirty-seven forever. but my 37th year was not a good one.  I was farming at the time, growing apples, and a very late freeze that year had  turned what was going to be a bumper crop into soft, black marbles that fell to the ground and rotted.  While the orchard never provided much in the way of income, it was something, and I needed another way to earn money, pronto.  Enter Wally.

Wally was a native of a nearby town.  When he was 14, his two older brothers had given him a good stiff dose of LSD and taken him to a Pink Floyd concert.  Although he had always been kind of a weird kid–sensitive, with big thick glasses that made his eyes look huge (like me), that experience, like similar ones I had at a slightly older age, seriously altered his life course. He decided to shake himself free of the small town and small minds he had grown up with, and wandered off in search of adventure, which he found in the Rainbow Family.  His first gathering connected  him with a vegetarian restaurant collective in Boulder, Colorado, where he got to meet, feed, and hang out with such luminaries as Timothy Leary and Joe Bageant.  His next swing through the Rainbow roundabout hooked him up as keyboard player with a band called “The Tools,” and sent him to Tulsa Oklahoma, where the band financed their debut album by laying carpet and vinyl in the boom years of the Reagan administration.

But then…. the lead singer, the irreplaceable voice on which the whole project hung, left to join a well-known-at-the-time pop group,whose name escapes me–something like Journey or Foreigner, but it wasn’t either of those.  The record was never released.  That left Wally with newly acquired carpet-laying skills, a wife and a new baby, the intention of being a songwriter, and a pretty decent recording studio that he knew how to use.  Then his studio was burglarized and his marriage came unglued, and he returned to his hometown, moved back in with his mom, and found work laying floor coverings.  The situation was somewhat freelance–he worked when the carpet store owners had a job for him, and was expected to keep track of his own Social Security, insurance, and–the good part-hours.

Before his Tulsa studio was burglarized, he had written and recorded  a country song called “My Car’s a Gasoholic and It’s Drivin’ Me to Drink.”  Now that he was within striking distance of the country music capital of the world, he took it around to radio stations, who gave it some airplay.  That, however, had all happened in the early 80′s, and he hadn’t been able to get a nibble since.   The bad news was, his car was a gasoholic, and that was the least of the things that was driving him to drink.  More on that later.

Most of his Rainbow and rock’n'roll attributes had fallen away by the time I met him.   He rarely played music anymore.  (His son told me that he had only heard his dad play once, all the time he was growing up.  “He sat down at my grandma’s Wurlitzer organ and played Pink Floyd’s ‘Echoes‘–all twenty-two minutes of it–and he totally nailed it.  I was amazed.”) He had cut his hair and shaved.  He eschewed health food, saying, “Mrs. Winners is my breakfast cook,”

So, laying carpets and vinyl–that’s where I came in.  Wally needed an assistant to help him lift rolls of carpet (They’re heavy!), move furniture out of the way, and generally take care of the little things so he could do the main thing–get the floor covered.   Working one-on-one with him, sharing long rides to job sites, lunch and sometimes dinner pizzas, and the occasional joint, we got to know each other pretty well.  He derided my live Grateful Dead tapes, saying, “About half the time, they sound like a small-time country bar band on a bad night,”  but he still loved Pink Floyd–and Frank Zappa.  One conversation that came around from time to time involved him telling me, “I’d like to quit smoking cigarettes.  I’d like to quit drinking coffee.  They’re both addictive drugs that are doing me no good, especially cigarettes.  But you can’t get into a program that will help you quit cigarettes and coffee.  If I wanted to quit smoking pot, I could get into a program tomorrow–and they’d let me drink all the coffee and smoke all the cigarettes I wanted.”  He tried to quit several times in the year I knew him, but something always happened to stress him out–the toilet broke, or his wife (at the time, but not for long) went on a tear.  Hey, she smoked cigarettes, too, and had just borne him a son that she seemed ill-equipped to mother.  My wife and I both heard a lot about this, because when he married again, he moved out of his mother’s home and into our very hippie-friendly neighborhood.

Wally was very good  at laying carpets. He had high standards and a strong sense of integrity about the work he did.  He was also politically radical, passionate, articulate, and had a mordant, punny sense of humor, all of which made him a lot of fun to work with–when he was there. Frequently, we would arrive at a job, get it laid out, and Wally would announce that he needed to go get some materials that we didn’t have, and leave me to get things started.  It would take him hours to return.  Sometimes I would be able to mostly complete the job, sometimes I got to a point where I just had to sit and wait for him.  He never had a satisfactory explanation for these absences, which strung out our work days until late at night, so that the next day would be a late start, and so on.

After he died, a mutual friend told me something about Wally that I had never even suspected–he was bi. I recalled someone Wally had introduced me to, just once, a guy who ran a costume shop and limo service, two very odd businesses for such a small, mainstream, lower class, boring burg as the one where we worked.  The guy was, besides, Wally, just about the only interesting  person I ever met from that sleepy southern town.  Was he Wally’s lover?   Were trysts with this guy (now dead from AIDS, I’m told)  the reason Wally disappeared for hours during the work day?  Or was he just out getting drunk, as another mutual friend suspected?  He didn’t seem particularly drunk when he came back from his extended absences.  I guess you could say that my gaydar was poor enough, and his was good enough (sex with other guys has never appealed to me), that the subject just never, uh, came up between us.

After a year, I got tired of the long, erratic hours and low pay, and, besides, the orchard had a good crop again.  I quit working for Wally.  He found another helper, and I gave the orchard business what turned out to be one last season.  You could say I farmed ’till I ran out of money.

Around the end of our year together, I had begun to take a more active interest in following  a spiritually motivated path in life, a decision that eventually led me to Buddhism.    I brought Wally to the home of the friend who was helping me move in that direction, and we sat for an hour or two, partook of some herb, and talked about cultivating self-discipline and getting in better alignment with  our higher intentions.  Wally excused himself after a while, and left.  Next time I saw him, I asked how it had been for him   “I’ve been there and done that,” he said, “and it’s not something I need in my life anymore.”

In the words of The American Book of the Dead,

This (was) the point of no return, the macrodimensional crowbar which separates the sentient voyagers who are liberated and those who take lower rebirth.

In one single instant they are parted from one another; in that instant, infinite freedom or the wheel once again.

Disclaimer:  I am not necessarily, in fact not likely, “liberated,” that’s just my intention–but Wally opted out.  A long road down lay ahead of him, but there was no way he could know that.

He had already come a long way down, in some respects.  One day, on the way to a job, he had taken me to a hilltop mansion which bore the name of one of the founding fathers of our country.  This, Wally told me, was where he had lived as a small child, with his mother and grandparents, after his father had died.  Wally was a direct descendant of that founding father, and a scion of one of the wealthiest families in our part of the state.  That wealth, however, had not been passed on to his mother, or to him.  There had been some kind of machinations when his grandfather died, and other relatives ended up with the estate, which was prime development property.  His mother now  lived in a modest home in a modest neighborhood in a nearby town.

On another occasion, we were driving down a country road.  “There used to be a pre-Civil War house in that field,” Wally said, pointing off to our right.  “It was just used for storing hay when I was a teenager.  One time, me and my friends were hanging out there, and we accidentally set it on fire, and it burned to the ground.  We got the hell out of there, and the police never did figure out who started the fire.”  In retrospect, I have to wonder if that, along with other revelations I will disclose in due course, added to the urgency of his decision to travel and see the world.

Since one of my best friends had taken up the challenge of working as Wally’s assistant, and Wally continued to live in the neighborhood, I kept in touch with him for a while.  He took too much weight the wrong way moving a carpet, and did something serious to his back, but kept on working.  What choice did he have?  Then his year-old son died. It was labelled a crib death, but one-year-olds don’t die of crib death.  Adding to the pain of that loss, the ambulance taking them to the hospital was totaled when a driver in front of the emergency vehicle came to a full stop right in front of it, causing a collision. Wally began to suspect that his wife had smothered the child in a fit of rage over his crying, but there was no way to prove it.  They split up, and he moved back in with his mom.

About that time, my own life came apart, and I moved to another state for about five years.. When I returned in the late nineties, a mutual friend told me Wally was living outside Nashville, and put us in touch.  I called him.  He sounded upbeat, with a new wife, a house on a lake, and a sailboat.  He invited me to come out, visit, and maybe go sailing.    I took him up on it.

The house was beautiful.  The sailboat was beautiful.  The lake was beautiful.  His household, on the other hand, was a soap opera.  His wife, whom he had met on-line, had an adult child who was mentally and emotionally handicapped, in a way that took up a fair amount of psycho-emotional space.  Wally and his new wife were not getting along well–they divorced not long after my visit–and Wally was drinking heavily to deal with both the emotional pain of another failing marriage–his fourth–and the physical pain generated by continuing to lay carpet with a deteriorating back.  He had tried to get out by becoming a car salesman, but in spite of his best efforts, he washed out of that highly competitive job market.  He had tried to start a new career by encouraging his previous wife (not the one I had known) to become an exotic dancer, (and he her manager), but she had left him for the club’s bouncer, who was not, as Wally was, twice her age. Wally was hurt by this.   “I shaved her pussy for her,” he complained, “and she left me.”  His current wife was definitely not exotic dancer material, and he was realizing he had made a mistake with her, too.   “When I visited her  in Boston, I discovered that she just left all her mail, bills and everything, in a pile on the table and never opened or answered anything.  That should have been a warning to me.”  His life was a mess, but there was nothing I could do to help him, not that he was asking for help.  We didn’t go sailing.  I excused myself as quickly as I could.  There’s no point in reaching out to somebody who doesn’t want to admit that they need a hand.

music:  Drive-by Truckers, “Dead Drunk and Naked“  (first link is video of live performance, second is the lyrics, which are relevant but hard to understand on the video)

I didn’t think much about Wally for the next eight or nine years, except once when I saw his name connected with a John Kerry campaign event in that same sleepy southern town where we had worked together.   The former Vietnam war protester, wealthy east coast intellectual, and reputed closeted potsmoking Deadhead didn’t resonate well with the rednecks in  our  red neck of the woods, and, while Kerry may have been cheated out of a victory in Ohio and elsewhere, he lost it fair and square down here in the South.  (A mutual friend later told me that Wally had been asked to separate himself from the local Kerry campaign because of his excessive drinking.)

Then I found Wally again through the magic of email.  A mutual friend sent out a missive and cc’d all his addressees instead of bcc’ing them, which is kind of a no-no, as it invites spam, but, being nosy, I looked through the addresses, and there was a wallywilson@yahoo.net.  Out of curiosity, I dropped him a line, asking, “Are you the Wally Wilson who used to lay carpet?”  And he wrote back that yes, he was.  One thing led to another, and I went to visit him.   His life had changed a lot.  The music, the wife, the house, the job, for that matter the ability to work–all were gone.  His two brothers, the ones who set him on the path he took, had taken a sharp right turn, become evangelical Christians, and written Wally and his radical politics out of their lives; he said he didn’t even know how to get in touch with them any more.  The sailboat, on the other hand, had morphed and grown, from a little lake boat to a 27-foot, seagoing vessel, big enough for a single guy to live in, which is just what he was doing.  But the boat was not in the water.  The boat was on a trailer, sitting in the front yard of his last employer.  Wally’s back was totally shot.  It hadn’t been so shot when he first acquired the boat, and therein lies a tale.

Wally had started drinking heavily in an effort to cope with his chronic back pain, but it didn’t help much.  He then had back surgery, which, as so often happens, didn’t help much,either  The good news was, this enabled him to qualify for SSI disability–the munificent sum of $600 and some change every month.  The bad news was, he was now taking massive amounts of prescription morphine for the pain, as well as drinking plenty of beer to take the edge off.  But the good news was, he he’d gotten several years worth of SSI checks in a lump sum, added up from the date he had first applied to the day his request was granted.  He split the award with his lawyer, and spent most of the rest of it buying and outfitting a sailboat he found online, on Long Island.  His plan was to sail the boat to Belize, where he would not be hassled for living in it, where pain meds  and living expenses in general were much cheaper,where it never got cold, and where his old buddy Joe Bageant could show him the ropes.  He set off down the East Coast, but ran the boat aground and tore up its keel near the entrance to Chesapeake Bay.  He limped up to the Washington, D.C., area, hoping to find a shipyard where he could do the repairs and a pain doctor who would rewrite his morphine prescription–but the DEA had just busted the best-known chronic pain doctor in the area, and nobody wanted to risk writing narcotics prescriptions for strangers.  Corralled by his need for morphine, he spent just about the last of his nest egg putting his dream boat on a trailer and hauling it to Nashville, where he could see a doctor who knew him.  He was hoping he could get the boat repaired, into the Tenn-Tom waterway, and back en route to Belize.

It didn’t work out that way.  He tore up his back even further trying to help his host plant a garden, and, penniless and barely able to move, resigned himself to staying where he was.  There was, he often told me, still money in the family pipeline for him, and when that came through, he would get the boat back in the water and make his getaway. He was waiting for his old uncle to die so he would get the money, about fourteen grand.  When he told me all the things he planned to do with that relative pittance, it was difficult not to tell him how unrealistic his expectations were–and when I did try to tell him, he didn’t want to hear about it.

But I’m getting ahead of myself.    I visited him at the beached boat just a few weeks before I myself fell down the health care rabbit hole, hit with a stroke while in the hospital for atrial fibrillation.  Our meeting was a friendly reunion; we emailed back and forth from time to time through the first winter of my recovery.  He had not lost his interest in politics, his radical perspective, or his desire to make the world a better place, and that gave us a firm basis on which to renew our friendship.  .Then, in May, 2009. he called for help.  His former employer had told Wally that he was getting ready to sell the farm where Wally was staying, and so it was time for him to find another place to live.  I tried to find somebody else to take him, but after a while it sank in–either Wally was going to move his boat to our place, or he was going to be out on the street, not a good place for a crippled older guy with a heavy morphine habit.  It was just for nine months, he promised–then his son would come help him get the boat water-worthy again, and he would be on his way to the Gulf coast, or beyond.  I, recently laid low by my own health issues, was glad to be able to be of some help to another human being.  He promised he wouldn’t be any trouble.

And so we tucked his boat away behind our barn, where it was unlikely to be noticed, but on a gravel pad just to give a nod to codes.  His former landlord towed the boat over, and a neighbor with a backhoe gave the boat the final push in.  It must have been a rough job for him–he hasn’t returned our calls since.  But I digress.  We ran an extension cord and a hose from the barn to the boat, and Wally had a new home.

We immediately began to realize that we’d taken on more than we’d bargained for.  At his previous location, he was in the middle of a big, flat open area, but at our place, he was in a deep valley, and the rancid smell of his beer, cigarettes, and meds-tainted body odor and urine created a bubble of second-hand smoke and nastiness that extended for a hundred feet or so around the boat.  You could literally smell him before you could see him.  In addition to his back problems, he had been diagnosed with panic disorder, for which he took Valium, among other things of a similar nature; cardio-obstructive pulmonary disease, the predecessor to emphysema, from smoking cigarettes for 40 years (and probably from inhaling glue fumes regularly in the course of laying  carpets and vinyl) ; and hepatitis C, the kind you only get from somebody else’s blood, i.e., sharing dirty needles, but he swore he didn’t know how he got it.  After he died, his son told me that Wally had been a heroin addict as a teenager.  I don’t think Wally ever told me that.  Maybe he was lying about not knowing how he got hepatitis C, or maybe it had been nearly dormant in him since his teenage heroin addiction, growing worse as he stressed his liver with alcohol.  He had also lost most of his teeth, and what stubs were left in his mouth were pretty rotten.  We don’t have lepers in 21st century America, but Wally, stooped, dazed, smelly, and nearly toothless,was as close as we get.

Once a handsome young charmer, he now seemed to revel in his ability to disgust people.  Catheterized for a while with a urinary infection, he wore shorts in public, with the bag hanging out the bottom of his pants.  Since he drank so little liquid, his spittle was thick and ropy, and formed lip-to-lip pillars when he opened his mouth.  He was skinny enough that his pants frequently started falling off what little there was of his ass, and he would be slow to hoist them.  I guess, if you’re really hard up for attention, you quit caring if you’re getting approval or disapproval.

music:  Kate Wolf, “The Hobo

But Wally wasn’t completely beaten down.  His computer and internet connection gave him a doorway into the world.   He was especially active on Democratic Underground, where he was appreciated for his heartfelt, thoughtful contributions–but from which he was eventually banned because he kept using the site to ask people to send him money.

Money was a continuous struggle for him.  He was on a dozen prescription medications, but Tenncare would only pay for five, and most of the drugs he needed to purchase were not generics.  Hey, Mr. Legislator, try buying seven prescription medications, feeding yourself, and keeping the lights and heat on, on $600 and change a month.   There were sometimes more than twelve prescriptions–his rotting teeth, which Tenncare would not pay to take care of, kept getting infected, which required frequent courses of antibiotics.  Frequent courses of antibiotics meant that the bugs in his system evolved resistance to antibiotics, which in turn meant that he had to take newer, stronger, and more expensive antibiotics.  Tenncare was willing to pay $125,000 for open heart surgery, the need for which could result from chronic gum and tooth infections, but Tenncare would not pay the thousand or so dollars it would take to pull his teeth and make dentures for him, and the SSI people wouldn’t let anybody give him the money to pay for the dental work, either.  Desperate to get his teeth fixed before the repeated infections tore a hole in his heart, he tried to borrow against the  small inheritance due him, but got the impression SSI, or at least some of the people implementing its policies. wouldn’t allow that, either.  However, when his son made inquiries about this, it started to look like Wally’s perception of the difficulties of paying for getting his teeth pulled was actually a misperception, fed on his side by his narcoticized, oxygen deprived, panic-prone mind, and by who knows what on the SSI end of the equation. By the time he finally got it together to get his teeth pulled, it would prove to be too late.

While morphine and fentanyl dulled the pain in his back, they did not stop it, or give him back the muscular strength that had atrophied.  He was so unsteady on his feet that he would fall down regularly, even with the help of a walker, although he needed that less after he was cured of Hepatitis C.  The only position in which he was comfortable was sitting cross-legged with his elbows on his knees, and that was how he spent most of his days, hunched over his computer or his meals.  The narcotics he was taking would cause him to nod off unexpectedly, and he told me he would frequently wake up with his face in his unfinished dinner, and another burn cigarette burn mark notched in the quilt on his bed, or, sometimes, his fingers.

And then there was Hepatitis C.  He had tried interferon therapy twice, but found the side effects too overwhelming, and had bailed.  His doctor told him he was nearing his last chance before the disease resulted in cirrhosis of his liver, a condition in which his liver would quit functioning and he would die.  This time, to help him get through the interferon, he found someone who would provide him with marijuana, and got his doctor’s agreement for this, although Tennessee is not a medical marijuana state.  But oops, there was another twist in the story–he was too underweight and malnourished to meet the health guidelines for the interferon.  A few months of special attention to diet took care of that, just barely–he was unable to afford the “nutrition drinks” that were recommended to him.  He asked us for an extension of his original nine month agreement, and we gave it to him,  with the understanding that his son would come through for a working visit the next summer and help him get the boat in the water.

Just now, in doing research for this story, I found out something that  I have to wonder if  Wally or his doctors were aware of.  On a website called  “Addiction Medicine,” I found, at the bottom of the page, this caveat:

When treating patients with hepatitis, one must be aware of the possibility of altered hepatic function leading to an altered metabolism of medications, especially antidepressants. The changes in metabolism could lead to toxicity. In a patient with liver disease and compromised liver function, encephalopathy can develop due to an inability to handle dietary protein. The use of antidepressants of the tricyclic class can cause impairment in the thinking processes due to their anticholinergic effects, adding to the encephalopathic impairment. A clinical picture of delirium can ensue. The use of benzodiazepines can worsen the delirium.

Wally, diagnosed with “panic disorder,” had been taking Valium, a benzodiazepine, daily. Did he get switched to something that wouldn’t clash with the interferon?  He certainly seemed to go through a change, a deterioration, really, of personality while he was on the interferon.  He became more withdrawn, more paranoid or maybe delusional (in the sense that he made up stories about why certain things happened that were not particularly based in reality), and less present.  The wild and crazy guy I had known was dissolving in a vat of chemicals.  “Personality changes” are listed as a side effect of interferon treatment.  I’d say that’s an understatement.

He made a brief comeback once he got off the interferon, cured of Hepatitis C.  We shared a feeling of triumph.  But the recovery of his personality was short-lived, and I soon understood why.  I learned that it is a widely ignored and unpopular, not to mention unprofitable, fact that our society’s highly pharmaceutical mode of dealing with mental disorders is not only ineffective, but actually precipitates greater incidences of more acute forms of “mental illness.” The drugs he was taking to balance his brain were making it less balanced, even less balanceable.

Still, Wally did his best to keep up appearances.  While he complained about the fact that my wife would only allow him in the house when she was gone, limiting his ability to take showers, he would only come in and take a shower  (and shave) when he had a doctor’s appointment coming up.  He put all the effort he could into appearing as normal as he could on those occasions, for what he feared more than anything was being declared incompetent to live on his own, and then confined to a nursing home.  Because he was on SSI, the only way he could continue to own the boat was to keep living in it.  If he left the boat, he would lose it, as well as his dream of independence on the water.  He would also, if he entered a nursing home, lose his much-anticipated inheritance.

Wally wanted to be generous, bless his heart.  He gave my wife a pretty watering can that had been his mother’s, but which was useless to my wife because of its small size.  He also attempted to pass on to her his grandmother’s sewing scissors, which may have been a precious antique with more than sentimental value, but did not work as sewing scissors.  We eventually gave them back to him, since he kept complaining that “After all the nice stuff I gave her, your wife still doesn’t like me.” He offered to bake us one of his self-described “delicious peach cobblers,” which turned out to be a (to us) inedible, over-sweetened goo made from flour, condensed milk, and canned peaches, with strong overtones of tobacco smoke.  His general preference for prepared and canned food, and use of paper plates–he said, and it was probably true, that it was too painful for him to stand up long enough to cook or wash dishes–generated mountains of bagged trash that lured raiding possums and raccoons and added to the smell around his boat.  We live a very low-trash lifestyle, and don’t have garbage pickup service, so we (including my wife’s father, who started helping us with Wally) ended up making more frequent dump trips than we would have made on our own.

The second summer, we nearly lost him.  He was scheduled for a doctor’s appointment, but hadn’t showed up for his  ride  I went around back to look for him, and found him collapsed next to the boat, unconscious and unarouseable, lying in the  full glare of the July sun.  I called 911, and an ambulance soon arrived.  Dehydration, we suspected.  As part of his anti-health food kick, he refused to drink water, imbibing only HFC-laced fruit drinks, coffee, and “cheapo cola,” as we jokingly called it.  But no, it wasn’t dehydration–it was an inadvertent drug overdose.  One of his pain medications was fentanyl, which he took as a skin patch.  At high temperatures, however, the patch delivered the drug much faster, and that, apparently, was what knocked him out.   In a few days, he was home. That was July.  In August, his son came again, and did his best to get the boat back in the water, but there was much, too, much for him to accomplish in just a month, and Wally, who was going through the interferon therapy that summer, was no help at all.  He would be with us a second winter.

He had quit drinking beer because alcohol and Interferon don’t mix, and when he wasdone with chemotherapy, he didn’t start drinking again.  He said he’d lost interest; I suspect that the medical marijuana that he was obtaining was also a far better  consciousness modulator for him than beer’s combination of alcohol and hops.

That was also the summer of the BP oil spill in the Gulf, which soured Wally on the idea of living in the water on the south coast.  (I can’t say that I blame him.)  He started to envision using his inheritance to tow the boat to the west coast instead, to be near his ex-wife and kids.  This seemed pretty unrealistic to me.  I told him I thought he could find a better boat out west for less than it would cost to tow his current vessel that far, since sailboats, a toy for the upwardly mobile,  were being abandoned at record rates as the economy deflated.  Wally wouldn’t hear of that.  His mind was made up.  He was hanging on to the boat he had.  We started thinking of him as Gollum, a being totally deformed by attachment to “his precious.”  His son found trying to work with Wally incredibly frustrating for the same reason.  Then the relationship with his ex that he had been rebuilding (at least in his own mind) collapsed, and he lost interest in moving west, too.

My wife and I began to doubt his competence.  He seemed incapable of managing the electricity in the boat.  He would put all his heaters and his microwave on the same plug, and then wonder why he tripped a circuit breaker.  Or he would not realize that he had unplugged something, and think he had tripped a circuit breaker, frequently in the middle of the night.  Then he would call us, generally just as we were getting ready for bed.  This was especially troublesome in winter,when the bill for his electric heater cost him between a quarter and a third of his income.  If the power went out and his electric heaters went off, the uninsulated fiberglass boat would not hold heat, and he would have no alternative but to seek shelter in our house, with two people whose lungs could not handle even secondhand smoke.  We had a spare room that he could have used in an emergency, but fortunately the winter passed without that crisis occurring.

As it was, I was exposed to second-hand smoke at least once a month, when I took him grocery shopping, or to a nearby pharmacy to pick up his narcotics.  That was our time to hang out together.  He did most of the talking on those occasions, except when he nodded out from his pain medications.  He generally repeated his latest version of the same monologue.  It could be difficult to interrupt him.  I had to learn to be humorously rude with him if I wanted to get a word in edgewise.  I occasionally had to do my best to intervene or apologize when he treated store employees rudely for reasons that seemed to have more to do with his need for self-assertion than the quality of the service he received.  My own disreputable appearance occasionally sparked comments on the level of, “Who’s taking care of who?”  I would laugh; Wally would at least act like he didn’t notice the question.

On one occasion, Wally was waiting for me with his groceries outside the market, when a guy in a wheelchair asked him for a smoke.  Wally gave the guy a cigarette and paid him no further mind, until he realized that his month’s supply of beer had vanished from his shopping cart and the wheelchair guy was hightailing it across the parking lot with the 24-pack in his lap.  Wally was particularly weak at this time, and using a walker.  He tried to give chase, but the beer snatcher easily outdistanced him.  We thought it was sad, but also, in a dark kind of way, very funny.  But Wally couldn’t afford to replace the beer.  I fronted it to him.  I ended up fronting him quite a bit, as did my wife’s father, when he started helping me with Wally’s errands.  Wally made some effort to pay us back, but on his income and with his needs it was a losing struggle.  That’s OK with me.  Throughout my life, I have been the recipient of a great deal of kindness, financial and otherwise, that I was never able to repay to my benefactors.  Wally was my chance to pay it forward.

When we told him that we did not want him with us through a third winter, at first he squawked, repeating his assertion that he was no trouble at all, in spite of what we might think, but then he seemed to kind of get into it–he looked forward to cruising the Cumberland in his sailboat, mooring out in places where he wouldn’t have to pay a marina fee, fishing for his dinner, maybe finding an isolated island to plant a pot crop on.  Nevertheless,  he complained about us on Democratic Underground,  posting, at the end of a note letting his  friends know he was cured of Hepatitis C:

PS, anyone got a 1 ton dually with a big engine and a ball hitch that would pull my 28 ft sailboat from Nashville to the California Delta (back Bay between around August 1st or I will arrive there without my home. I’m being evicted because the people who own the land I’m on worry about me wintering in an uninsulated sailboat, when I’ve got snug electric heat with a gas back up. Oh Well, I have little contact with them anyway and my kids arere out there.

Notice, he didn’t mention his ex-wife or the fact that his gas heater hadn’t worked in quite some time, or that when it had worked, he needed to leave the hatch open and let the heat out or he’s asphyxiate.  Also, while he thanked me profusely to my face for helping him get through the interferon, he dismissed our connection with “I have little contact with them anyway.”   Wally was very good about appearances.  Here, he was seeking sympathy (and several thousand dollars worth of somebody’s time and money, though there were no takers), and cast us as cruel and distant, in a forum of which we were unaware and thus unable to respond.

It’s true, we weren’t able to give him everything he needed, and so his feeling of disappointment was, in a way, justified.  For me, the difficulties of our relationship were lessons on the limits of my compassion and the need to draw boundaries.  I aspired to love him unconditionally, to be there for him as much as possible, possibly even to lift his consciousness enough to give him some insight into himself.  I was not equal to the task.  Wally was a bottomless pit, a black hole of human need.  Between the psychiatric drugs and  his habit of blaming his troubles exclusively on outside circumstances, there was no way I could move him.  He may have hit bottom, but he still was too proud to ask for help–which, more than his smell and appearance, was what repulsed my wife.  As many times as I tried to explain that to him, he never got it.

I started to understand what “compassion fatigue” means.  I knew what the kind, compassionate thing to do was, but I still had to grit my teeth to do it. And I wasn’t dealing with tens of thousands of hungry, traumatized war refugees, just one chronically ill borderline homeless guy.  My hat is off and my heart is out to those who can take on so much more than I apparently can! I was grateful when my father-in-law, who shared Wally’s interest in sailing, stepped in and started taking Wally on his grocery and other shopping runs.

Wally’s son came that third summer, armed with several thousand dollars and his professional boat building skills, to get ‘er in the water.  He arrived in August, expecting a Labor Day launch, but that turned out to be wildly optimistic.  He discovered that the repairs  that Wally had made on the boat were  so poorly done that they needed redoing,   Wally argued frequently with his son, bouncing between being an obnoxious know-it-all (who actually knew very little) and a passive zombie who just sat in the boat and said, “whatever.”

I had one exchange with him, which he started by complaining to me about how bossy his son was being.  I responded by telling him that the young man, in my observation, knew what he was doing, that he was doing Wally a huge favor by spending so much time and money to help a father who had been largely absent when he was growing up, and that Wally ought to be grateful for his help.  Furthermore, I told him, he needed to recognize that his own abilities and judgment were clouded by not only the drugs he was taking but the fact that due to his COPD-on-the-way-to-emphysema, his brain was probably not getting enough oxygen to function at full capacity.  He pretty much quit talking to me after that.

It was the end of October before we got the boat in the water, miles downstream from the marina where Wally had a slip rented, but at the only place in Nashville with a boat launcher big enough to handle a 27-foot sailboat.   His son traveled with him to steer the boat upriver to Wally’s new home.   It was a good thing he did.  The river was low, and, in spite of having an up-to-date cyberchart of the passage, the boat still ran aground twice.  The younger Wilson–let’s call him Lawrence–had to climb in the rowboat and row for all he was worth to get the boat unstuck, something Wally, with his compromised body, could never have done, and Wally knew it.  Wally also realized that this meant that his dream of exploring the wilds of the Cumberland was unrealistic.  Then, just as they were about to reach their destination,  the sailboat’s keel hit something hard sticking out of the bottom of the lake, and rocked so violently that it knocked Wally over.  His son did a quick dive and discovered that whatever they had collided with had recreated the same hole in the keel that had caused Wally to pull the boat out of the water in Chesapeake Bay so many years ago–but now he was stuck in a marina where he couldn’t get the boat out of the water and fix it.

I intended to go visit Wally and see his new place, but put it off, thinking he would tell me when he needed to renew his medical stash. But no call came.

Then an email arrived, in response to a “how’s it goin?” query from me:

Actually Martin,,thijngs areb niot goinng well. I’m in Sumner hosptal and needining a bail out .I’m in critical carebwith an infection and too skaky to type.call me xxx-xxxx In hve my phone

That was followed just a few minutes later with

CALL ME  EMERGENCY MEASUES NEEDED  IN CRITICAL CARE AT GALLATIN CALL ME   xxx-xxxxTHEN I”LL NEED MINISTERIAL HELP YOURB KIND OF JOB

He had included his phone number, even though he must have known I still had it.  So I called him.   He sounded weaker and more confused than he had been.  He wanted me to give him a ride back to the boat, or maybe to St. Thomas Hospital in Nashville.  Thanksgiving was coming up; I had family to deal with, and wasn’t sure when I could make it out to see him. His son gave me the code that enabled me to talk to his nurses, and they did not sound too worried.   They said  that, while he needed open heart surgery–he had a damaged aortic valve, probably from some combination of 40 years of tobacco and all the tooth and  gum infections he had had,  they couldn’t do it there and at the moment he was too weak to risk it,  but they were going to send him to another hospital where he could regain some strength and have the surgery.  They didn’t seem to think he was in any immediate danger of dying.  I figured I’d go see him after the holiday.  I told him I was thankful he had access to good medical care that didn’t cost him anything.   My recent two-day hospital stay, with no surgery involved, had set me back eleven thousand dollars.

The Monday after Thanksgiving, I put off going to see him until Tuesday. I needed a day to decompress, I told myself.  Monday night, his son called me.  Wally’s heart rate was rising and his blood pressure was dropping.  He had lost consciousness.  A couple of hours later, Lawrence called again.  Wally’s heart had stopped–they had defibrillated him and gotten a pulse going, but he had no blood pressure.  When I called the hospital Tuesday morning, they told me he had died at 11PM.   I had put off going to see him just one day too long.   I had “left it for somebody other than me/To be the one to care.”  Let that be a lesson to me.

music:  Simon and Garfunkel:  The Boxer

So, what does it have to do with the Green Party?  Why has this loser written over eight thousand words about the life of that loser?

In my view,  the snowballing tragedy that was Wally’s life could have been prevented–and Wally was just one of millions, maybe tens of millions of people in similar circumstances.  Wally critically injured his back  in order to create stupid American suburbia, the construction of millions of homes and so-called “communities” that should never have been built in the first place.   Still,better working conditions and better health care could have prevented the kind of back injury that brought him –literally–to his knees, or at least treated it more rationally than knee-jerk back surgery.  A saner societal attitude about pain management would have been a big help, as would a less pharmaceutically oriented approach to his panic episodes.  After he died, I found out that he had been molested as a small child, which may well have been at the core of his panic. But our psychiatric system is set up to medicate patients, not to talk with them or coach them on changing their attitudes and behaviors. You don’t sell as many pills if you actually cure people.

The tobacco industry took about $50,000 of Wally’s money over the forty years he smoked–that’s figuring two packs a day for those forty years–and never paid a dime that actually helped him quit or covered his medical expenses.  Tobacco is sacred to the natives of this continent.  I have no problem with people who want to grow their own and use it in the traditional fashion.  But to have a multi-billion dollar business dedicated to addicting people to a substance that will make them sick unto death seems to me to be criminally insane. And then there’s alcohol…..

In the final years of his life, Wally was squeezed into penury and misery by the stinginess of our social welfare system.  Some of the stinginess manifested in the lack of care and oversight in Wally’s life.  Back in the nineties, I got paid to do the kinds of things I did for Wally on a volunteer basis.  In the aughts, in Tennessee, money was no longer available for that kind of thing, and without me and my father-in-law, he would have simply gone without. Nobody in the system seemed to be looking out for him.  He didn’t have a case manager, somebody who could hold a long-term overview of what was happening with him. Privacy rules kept me, his only friend, from connecting with the people who were taking care of bits and pieces of his life.

Trillions for banks and defense contractors,  six hundred a month and no personal care for somebody who’s too sick to work. No dental coverage, and  only 5 paid-for prescriptions–although, in my opinion, a saner health care system would do more to encourage people to cultivate healthy living habits so that they didn’t need pharmaceuticals, and emphasize the use of simple, inexpensive, natural substances over prescription medications. But gee, that would take money away from defense contractors or insurance, pharmaceutical and hospital CEOs who really need it.

I fault our medical model, as well as our health care  delivery system.   Our medical paradigm treats symptoms.  Others, such as Chinese, Tibetan, and Ayurvedic medicine, treat the system, not the symptom.   In Wally’s case, he could have had a much more generous SSI stipend and coaching on improving his diet, and survived much longer and more happily, for a fraction of what the government got billed for hospital care in his final weeks. When Jesus said, “Unto them that have, shall be given,” I don’t think that’s what he was talking about. What it all boils down to is that Wally, and us taxpayers who covered his bills, were taken for a ride by our profit-oriented medical-pharmaceutical “industry.” We need a better way.  Like, a not-for-profit health care system, y’know?

Goodbye, Wally.  You were kind of a jerk, but you  were a well-intentioned jerk, and you didn’t deserve the treatment you got from the culture you were born into.  Next time I have a chance to help somebody like you, I promise I’ll do a better job.

music:  Jackson Browne, “Rock Me on the Water





“WHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS….”

12 11 2011

I’ve been eagerly following, and occasionally participating in, the Occupy! movement here in Nashville, and it gladdens my heart to see so many young people taking up the cause, just when it seemed like the only folks interested in a just society were just us old holdouts from the 60′s.  Suddenly the land is full of real “new green shoots,” and I am impressed with the intelligence, as well as the fervor, of this new generation.

Their reception has been mixed.  In New York, the unions are supporting the Occupation, giving it a far broader base of support than any left-wing movement in this country has had since the 1930′s.  I think I can call “Occupy!” a left-wing movement.  It certainly isn’t right-wing.  Faux News and the Republicans are not eager to support this non-corporate-funded, genuine grass roots movement, which, unlike the Tea Party, is not willing to be a patsy for corporate interests that seek to further eviscerate the regulatory functions of government.

In many rust-belt communities, where cities and whole states have long felt ripped off by the federal government’s “free trade” policies and what they have done to what was once America’s industrial heartland, the Occupy movement is being welcomed by local authorities, who have given up on asking for help through the normal channels.  “CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW!?”

Richmond, Virginia, on the other hand, borrowed a page from Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians and sent in the bulldozers to remove Occupy Richmond.

And, on the other side of the country, we have had the spectacle of the Oakland Police shooting teargas cannisters directly at unarmed protesters, seriously wounding an Iraq War vet in the process.  The good news is, the mayor fired the city police chief for that little imbroglio.  Oakland Mayor Jean Quan later said

Like many Oaklanders, I support the goals of those protesting on behalf of the 99% today. Police Chief Jordan (he’s the NEW head cop) and I are dedicated to respecting the right of every demonstrator to peacefully assemble, but it is our duty to prioritize public safety.

In what was apparently supposed to be a conciliatory gesture, she allowed city employees who wanted to participate in the general strike to do so, as a “vacation day.”

Here in Nashville, there has been a fair amount of push coming to shove, all of it fortunately non-violent so far.  After Occupy Nashville! had been conducting a round-the-clock demonstration in Legislative Plaza for a few weeks, the state decided that it was going to close the plaza to the public between 10 PM and 8AM, and require anybody who wanted to have a political demonstration there to get a permit and a million dollars worth of liability insurance.  It didn’t take long for the ACLU and a judge to remind the state that this was a direct violation of the First Amendment, especially since state troopers failed to arrest theater patrons who crossed the plaza after 10PM.

And what will happen to the movement, all across the country, as we go into this winter, a winter that could truly be called “the winter of our discontent”?  Some Occupy movements are considering “occupying” foreclosed homes as a way to continue the protest indoors.  We shall see.

Meanwhile, “what do they want?” seems to be the question a lot of people are asking.  There has been a “declaration” issued by #Occupy Wall Street, which has been criticized by some as “unfocussed,” to which the Occupiers respond, “All of our Grievances are Connected!”  Indeed, they are.  I thought it would be worthwhile to look at both the Occupiers’ document and the U.S. Declaration of Independence, both to compare the two and to see how many of the Declaration of Independence’s charges against the English Crown might still apply to the relation between the American people and our homegrown oligarchy.  That’s what I’m going to start with, but first let’s take a music break.

music:  REM “Welcome to the Occupation





“LET FACTS BE SUBMITTED TO A CANDID WORLD”

12 11 2011

So, let’s revisit that American foundation document, “The Declaration of Independence.”

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

OK, first of all, nobody in the Occupy movement is calling for overthrow of the government.  For one thing, that’s a certain route to violent suppression .  But–”Governments…deriv(e) their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.”  What we who are in the 99% are saying is that the current government of the United States, whether “Republican” or “Democrat,” is not pursuing policies that are conducive to our “Life,Liberty, and pursuit of Happiness.”There has, once again, been “a long train of abuses and usurpations.”  That would seem to indicate that it is, once again, our “right and duty” to “throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for (our) future security.”

Next in the Declaration come the “Facts submitted to a candid world,” a detailing of the “repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny.”  Let’s read through them and see to what extent they still, or once again, apply.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

OK….I could spend the whole hour talking about that item alone.  The only difference is that, instead of a single, mad monarch sitting on the throne England, our modern “he” is our Congress, which is held in thrall to special interests, and does their bidding rather than doing what is “wholesome and necessary for the public good.”  Let’s see–universal single-payer health care, serious regulation of our banking and financial sector, meaningful environmental legislation, the legalization of at least medical marijuana–these and many more causes enjoy widespread public support and would bring widespread public benefit, but are not “politically possible” because they would reduce or eliminate the profits of certain corporate “persons” who are, apparently, more equal than us mere flesh and blood persons.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

The most outstanding current example of this is how the federal government is interfering with state medical marijuana programs, from the ruling in Raich vs. Ashcroft in which the Supreme Court held that marijuana grown in somebody’s back yard for their personal consumption was somehow covered by the interstate commerce clause and thus subject to federal law, to the current DOJ campaign against any kind of business providing marijuana to people with medical needs.  Other examples:  the not-so-strict federal “do not call” law superseded Wisconsin’s stricter statute, and a wide array of local environmental regulations.

”It is the 1970s in reverse. Then, the feds stepped in with more stringent standards than the states to ensure that the environment was protected,” said Steve Hinchman, a staff attorney with the Conservation Law Foundation in Maine. ”Now, as states get ahead of the federal government, they’re stepping in to protect industry at the expense of people who are forced to breathe this air.”

That was said of the Cheney administration, but Obama has, according to many observers, been no great improvement on Cheney.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

Nothing domestic here–but look at the role the U.S. has played in supporting dictators and repressing popular movements around the world–think Palestine, think Pakistan, Indonesia, fill in the blank.  Sure, we helped topple Qadhafi, but he was not only repressing dissent in Libya, he was about to ask to be paid for his oil in gold, rather than U.S. dollars.  That was the straw that broke the camel’s back.  The Syrian government can shoot or torture anyone it wants, apparently, as long as they don’t challenge U.S. hegemony.  The Occupy Declaration echoes this:

  • They have perpetuated colonialism at home and abroad.
  • They have participated in the torture and murder of innocent civilians overseas.

OK, back to the Declaration of Independence:

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

Two hundred years ago, the speediest land transportation was a fast horse.  Today, the ruling class has made legislative bodies “uncomfortable and distant”  by raising the cost of campaigning so high that the only way to run for office with any hope of success is to be independently wealthy, or to be dependent on contributions from the ruling class–who will not support anyone who does not support them.  As a result, our state and national governments are primarily concerned with maintaining the privileged position of those who have bought them, leaving the rest of us  exposed to various economic and social “convulsions within,” all the while scaring everyone they can with the danger of “invasion from without.”  Again, the Occupy Declaration touches on this point:

  • They have donated large sums of money to politicians, who are responsible for regulating them.

The D of I, again:

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

This is one of the few issues where I have some sympathy for the English position.  One of the complaints of the Europeans who settled what is now the USA was that the English wanted to keep them east of the Appalachians, and reserve the territory west of the mountains for the original inhabitants.  Because of that, and because the English were concerned about their colonies being subverted by too many non-English immigrants,  Crown policy attempted to limit the number of Europeans who invaded Turtle Island. Those doing the invading, on the other hand, sought safety in numbers.  To me, it is one of the great ironies of US immigration policy that a bunch of people of European descent are trying to stop native people from Mexico and Central America from entering this country–a trade and migration route that predates European arrival by thousands of years.  And, of course, there’s the further irony that it is US foreign trade policy that has destroyed the economies of these people’s native countries, pushing them to come here because, as Willie Sutton said, “it’s where the money is.”  The Occupy Declaration touches on immigration only obliquely, saying

  • They determine economic policy, despite the catastrophic failures their policies have produced and continue to produce.

Back to the Declaration of Independence:

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

These three provisions are all about the proliferation of bureaucracy and the perversion of civil government by money and power, which is at the heart of the complaint of the Occupy movement.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

Hey, no problem!  We’ll just buy the legislators and get them to approve the maintenance of a large standing army–and make sure it looks like it’s never  a time of peace!  And that bought legislature will never question the importance of military appropriations, making our military effectively “independent of and superior to the Civil power.”  Quoth the Occupiers:

  • They have perpetuated colonialism at home and abroad.
  • They have participated in the torture and murder of innocent civilians overseas.
  • They continue to create weapons of mass destruction in order to receive government contracts.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

If I were a right-winger, I’d start raving about U.N. black helicopters at this point, but that, in my opinion, is pure paranoia.  The real way in which America has been “subject(ed) to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws,” has been U.S. participation in NAFTA and the WTO, both of which subordinate local environmental and labor safeguards to the profit motives of transnational corporations.

music:  REM, “Cuyahoga

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

The U.S.A. accounts for nearly half of the world’s military spending, but it’s invisible to most of us:  our armies are spread across over 700 overseas military bases.  The Americans to whom this is not invisible are the families of our soldiers, often from small towns where U.S. government/corporate policy destroyed the local economy and job market, leaving many young people with no choice but the military.  And the second point, “protecting (military personnel) from punishment for any Murders which they should commit”?  That’s why we have (kind of) withdrawn our armies from Iraq–the government we installed refused to give us carte blanche to go on killing civilians and getting away with it.  Gee, the U.S. has been murdering civilians in Iraq with impunity ever since the invasion–What’s the big deal?  Oh, well, we can keep on killing civilians–even American citizens–in Pakistan and Yemen, and probably some other place we haven’t heard of yet.  All is not lost.

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

As The Living Theater used to exclaim, “I cannot travel without a passport!”  Nowadays, the problem is not the “cutting off of Trade,” but the opening up of trade:  Chinese imports have destroyed US manufacturing capacity, and US grain exports have destroyed Latin American agriculture.  In both cases, the people lose and the corporations win.  On the other hand, in the 18th century, individuals could travel without passports, in most places.  Nowadays, governments use their passport authority to keep people out of their countries:  here in the U.S., Palestinian Fulbright scholars, German publishers, Afghani women’s rights activists, and English environmental activists, among others, have been excluded so that they will not infect the American public with their subversive ideas.

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

Since our government has been taken over by corporate interests, our tax system has, in essence, been changed without our consent:  the share of government revenue that comes from corporate taxes has shrunk, so that the burden of supporting corporate government falls predominantly on the shoulders of individuals of modest means, who have to deal with not only income taxes and sales taxes, but property taxes, which keep rising as municipalities receive less money from state and national government coffers.

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

This issue is not on Occupy’s radar, but it is a serious one.  According to PBS, 95% of all criminal cases never go to a jury; they are decided by what is called “plea bargain,” but should more properly be termed “blackmail.”  What happens is this:  prosecutors charge a defendant with everything they can possibly think of, a laundry list that will likely result in decades of prison time, but then inform their victim that if he or she will plead guilty to just one of the charges, or, in the case of drug busts, turn someone else in, they will avoid the expense of a jury trial and, the likelihood of much longer incarceration.  Maybe the defendant is innocent, or was acting on principle, but the pressure to agree to a plea bargain is overwhelming, 95% of the time, it seems.  Deprived, indeed, of the “benefits of Trial by Jury.”

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

Uuhh…ever heard of “extraordinary rendition”?

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

Several claims in this section of  the “facts submitted to a candid world” seem to me to duplicate ones that have already been stated, but the last one, about plundering the seas, and so on, while it was set in a military context at the time, is true today in a corporate framework.  Corporate fishing has plundered our seas, and globalization has “burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.”

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

BlackwaterWackenhut.  Corrections Corporation of America.  ‘Nuff said.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

The modern parallel of this charge is, again, the way exploitive corporations have destroyed communities.  For example, in the Appalachian coal fields, mountaintop removal provides a very few people with good-paying jobs–destroying the country and culture they live in.  And, lastly…

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

Again, my sympathies lie with the Native Americans, who only subjected us  undocumented European immigrants to “undistinguished destruction” after we did the same to them.  When all is said and done, all of us who are not of Native American descent are trespassers on this continent.  In the 21st century, we’re just accessories after the fact, so to speak, but many of the framers of the Declaration of Independence actually killed Native Americans in order to steal their land.  This theft kind of erodes the “sacred honor” of our nation’s founders, but, at this point, hey–it is what it is.  Nowadays in America, we don’t get real politically-inspired mayhem–just the threat of it, trumpeted by our national insecurity apparatus.  And, finally….

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

We, too, have “Petitioned for Redress in humble terms…have appealed to (the) native justice and magnanimity” of our allegedly representative government, decade after decade, issue after issue.  How many on-line petitions did you sign today? At this point I am reminded of the words of a populist activist who was active about halfway between the time of the Declaration of Independence and the present day, William Jennings Bryan:

We do not come as aggressors. Our war is not a war of conquest. We are fighting in the defense of our homes, our families, and posterity. We have petitioned, and our petitions have been scorned. We have entreated, and our entreaties have been disregarded. We have begged, and they have mocked when our calamity came.

We beg no longer; we entreat no more; we petition no more. We defy them!

For all his fervor and popular appeal, Bryan went down to defeat, at the hands of the same forces we face today.  He, a very Jeffersonian Democrat, was overwhelmed by Republican promises of growth and prosperity, and slurs that associated him with “anarchists,” who were to voters of that day what “socialists” are to modern American voters–boogeymen.  Some things don’t change much, it seems.

But some things have changed.  Unlike the eighteenth and early twentieth centuries, we no longer live in an era when resources and possibilities seem unlimited.  Promises of future growth and prosperity now ring hollow, and only the delusionaries in the Tea Party retain their faith in the Corporate American Dream.   We have, in the words of the Declaration, endured “a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny.”  It is, indeed, time to “alter our former system of government.”  If we don’t, we will fall even further under the power of sociopathic corporate “persons,” who, like vampires, have no thought of altruism, only self-aggrandizement.

To borrow the words of the chief writer of The Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, we must “swear upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.”

music:  Patti Smith, “People Got the Power





THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM

12 11 2011

Because I am deeply committed to “occupying” our homestead, and there’s nobody to do some of the chores but me, I haven’t spent a lot of time with Occupy Nashville, but, at one of the General Assemblies I was able to attend, a young woman brought up an issue that, to me, is “the elephant in the room” in this whole movement. She said her grandma had just died, and the family was trying to figure out whether to let the bank take the house back, since she was behind on her mortgage, or to let Medicare take it to pay back her substantial hospital bills. Her grandma, she said, had been on the point of getting the house paid off when the company she had worked for most of her life renegged on its pension promises, so she had to refinance the house just to have money to live on.

To me, this is a prime example of one of the major processes that is impoverishing the middle class, one that nobody ever seems to talk about–between the rising costs of health care and “retirement homes,” most young people are not getting any kind of inheritance from their parents or grandparents. Instead, older peoples’ assets are sucked up by big corporations, whether in the guise of “elder care” for the healthy, or hospital care for the terminally ill,  which is frequently insensitive and invasive, and, at great expense,  prolongs the agony of death rather than the quality of life. I think a response to these widely accepted ripoffs needs to become a more conscious part of the demands of the Occupy movement.  It’s certainly part of the reason why so many young people find themselves trapped in poverty these days.

“Retirement communities” that isolate the elderly, and futile attempts to prolong the lives the dying are both examples of how our society has monetized everything it possibly can, at the expense of human relationships–and inheritances.   We need to return to multi-generational households, in which grandparents, among others, play an active role–and enrich their grand children’s lives by their presence.  In one of her better moments, Hillary Clinton quoted the African proverb, “It takes a village to raise a child.”  “The village” is based on long-term relationships.  Our brothers, sisters, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and so on are called “relatives” for a reason–we’re supposed to RELATE with each other.  In past, slower times, family members rarely traveled far, and stayed in relationship, for better or sometimes for worse.  I’m not saying we have to go back to being ignorant peasants.  We now know much more than we did two hundred years ago about how to communicate, how to maintain–or dissolve–boundaries, and many other aspects of human psychology and relationship.  We have the opportunity to grow up as a species, and some of us, it seems, have the courage and strength to climb that ladder.

So, there’s our relationships with the living, and then there is the question of our relationship with death and dying.  We have institutionalized our fear of death.  The societal supposition is that we will do anything possible to keep someone from dying, often even if it means that a life support system is beating their heart and pumping their lungs for them while they lie there comatose.  This is great for the Gross Domestic Product, it’s great for the hospitals and their staff, but it does nothing for the dying person and only sucks money out of the pockets of whoever is paying for their care.

It used to be that people died at home, surrounded by their families.  Death was no stranger.  Nearly everybody had seen someone, probably several someones, die.  Now, people mostly die isolated in hospitals, surrounded by machines and jacked-up medical personnel.  I humbly submit that this is not an improvement.  We have become estranged from death.  We need to muster up our courage and allow death back into our lives again.  It just might help the world slip back into harmony.

This may seem to be a long way from the immediate concerns of the Occupy! movement, let alone the politics of the Green Party.  But both the Occupy! movement and the Green Party are ultimately about a fundamental restructuring of society.  It doesn’t get much more fundamental than death and family.  If we’re serious, we have got to go there.

music:  The Waterboys, “Let it Happen





HOW CAN WE CREATE A BETTER WORLD….if we can’t even get along with each other?

15 10 2011

Last Saturday,I was invited to speak, on behalf of the Cumberland-Green River Bioregional Council, on the topic of “How can we create a better world.”  Here’s the text of the invitation:

Still being planned. Educate people against corporatism and militarism. This will be held at the Belmont United Methodist Church. WE NEED VOLUNTEERS! If you want to be a speaker on any related topic, or create and staff a literature booth on any topic that is related even indirectly, or help in any other way, contact J. H.  (note: NOT Jason Holleman!)

It seemed to me that the Green Party was a natural to participate in this event, so I invited another Green Party member in town to get together a table for the event–but then we got the word back, that because the Green Party is a political organization, and this is being put on by two 501(c)3 organizations, they couldn’t have any political organizations represented. This seemed pretty bizarre to me, and I decided that I would bring Green Party material to the teach-in and mention the exclusion of the Green Party in my remarks.  Here’s what I said:

Good afternoon!  I’m here on behalf of the Cumberland-Green River Bioregional Council, an organization which has been encouraging people to think local, non-corporate, low-tech, and sustainable for the last twenty-eight years. We are loosely affiliated with the North American Bioregional Congress, which holds hemisphere-wide gatherings every few years. The most recent one was actually here in Tennessee.

But, before I go into our long and honorable history, and our continued relevance today, I want to speak up on behalf of an organization that was disinvited from this gathering–yes, told not to come–The Green Party.  We ( I say ‘we” because I am a member of the Green Party of Tennessee) were told that we are “a political organization” and that inviting us to this teach-in would violate the not-for-profit, charitable/educational status of both Belmont Church and the Peace and Justice Center.  I have also been told by the organizers that  they excluded a half-dozen Democratic Party tablers on the same grounds.  Now,  a half-dozen representatives from one of the parties that is generally held to be the cause of all this mess seems a bit much, but I think it would have been “fair and balanced” to allow one Democrat table and one Green Party table.   Republicans?  Maybe they could run a dunking tank–” See if you can dump Bill Ketron in the cold, cold water–3 throws for only two dollars!”

But seriously, as I understand the IRS’s rules, not allowing the Green Party–and the Democrats– to participate in this teach-in is a misunderstanding of IRS guidelines, which state:

“…the law prohibits political campaign activity by charities and churches by defining a 501(c)(3) organization as one “which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.”

There is no impending election (unless you’re a Republican Presidential candidate). The Green Party’s representative at this gathering would not be a “candidate for public office,” –nor, considering the current political climate in Tennessee, would the Democrats be likely to produce a candidate, either–or at least, not a viable one.

The IRS’s guidelines further state:

The presentation of public forums or debates is a recognized method of educating the public. … (nonprofit organization formed to conduct public forums at which lectures and debates on social, political, and international matters are presented qualifies for exemption from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3)). Providing a forum for candidates is not, in and of itself, prohibited political activity. Candidates may also appear or speak at organization events in a non-candidate capacity.

My understanding of what that means is that there is no legal reason why The Peace and Justice Center cannot have a representative of the Green Party at this teach-in, and a Democrat too.  But it seems to me that, if we are going to talk about how we can create a better world, it would be important to have the Green Party in on the discussion since it, unlike the Democrats and Republicans, is not in thrall to our corporatocracy.  If electoral politics have a role in our future–and sometimes i wonder how long that will continue to be the case–the Green Party has a very important role in this movement, and needs to be included.  Just for openers, the Green Party does not accept corporate contributions, period.  While we are best known for our national candidates, we has had the most success in local races, which brings us back to the Green Party’s bioregional roots.  The Green Party in the United States, and here in Tennessee, was started by bioregional activists who wanted to bring bioregionalism’s local, ecological focus into the political arena.

OK, enough about the Green Party–back to the Cumberland-Green River Bioregional Council.  Nearly thirty years ago, when the Bioregional movement first took shape, peak oil and financial, political, and ecological breakdown were barely a whisper on the horizon, but when I look at what we were envisioning, it seems that perhaps we were intuiting a future in which human social organization would once again be highly decentralized and limited by how far a person could walk or drive a horse cart in a day.  Our message then, as now, is to dig in where you are, to get to know not just the people in your neighborhood, but the natural world you inhabit as well, and to base your decision-making not on short-term gain for human beings, but on the long-term benefits for the whole ecology.

“Know your watershed,” we have urged–know where your water comes from and where it goes, and make your watershed the basis of your political awareness. We view watersheds as embedded in “bioregions,” areas unified not just by proximity but by biotic community–similar forests, rocks, wild animals,  and weather.  Now, nearly thirty years on, this way of viewing the world seems more important than ever.  As global warming and other modes of increased human interference with the environment bring vast, unintended, and nearly unimaginable changes, more than  ever we need to cultivate a deep awareness of our local environment.  The odds are increasing on the likelihood that our watersheds, and not the global market economy, will be what provides us with food, shelter, medicine, household goods, and a social life in the future.  We had better learn the skills we will need to do this well, while we still have the leisure to do so.  A graceful future is still possible.  While it’s true that mere lifestyle changes aren’t enough to induce the transformation the world needs, without lifestyle changes the transformation won’t happen, either.  We need to pursue both the personal and the political.

I have a confession to make:  i don’t feel like I’m doing a very good job of getting connected with  my own neighbors.  My wife and I don’t seem to have a lot in common with them culturally, or counterculturally, and so we doubt that we would be very effective organizers. We don’t sit easy with that, and are looking for ways to cross the cultural divide without having to act like we are something we are not, or acting like we are not something we are..  We’re open to suggestions.

There’s another aspect of our experience in the Cumberland-Green River Bioregional Council that I can’t stress too much, and that’s the long-term relationship aspect.

In its earlier years, the Council was a kind of “Tennessee, North Alabama, and South-Central Kentucky Federation of Hippies, Anarchists, and Activists,” and in many ways, it still is.  Back then, however, our quarterly convocations at members’ country farms and communities were great tribal gatherings, with a hundred or more–sometimes many more– adults and children camping out, sharing practical knowledge during the day, and then having delightfully wild parties that, for some at least, lasted until dawn, and beyond.  We sang, played guitars and an assortment of other instruments, drummed, danced, and interacted deeply with each other.  Those of us who are still involved from those early days are bonded in ways that are rare and precious in the alienated culture in which we are all now enmeshed.

But not all of our early companions are still with us, and  I don’t mean because they have already died, although that is a seemingly inescapable part of life.  With deep interaction comes not only the possibility of deep bonding, but the possibility of deep wounding.  We have lost people from the Council due to betrayal, divorce, and disappointment, to name just a few of the separating circumstances.–not to mention the occasional participant who became so obnoxious when the energy was up that few others wanted to keep including them in our activities.  What led to this dispersal, to a certain extent, in my opinion, is that we lacked a common psycho-spiritual technology that might have enabled us to be more sensitive to each other, to listen to each other better, to let go of our own neuroses–you can’t make anybody else let go of theirs, all you can do is try to set a good example–to give each other the love and attention, not to mention the appropriate treatment, that might have kept our ranks strong and united. There are ways for groups of people to do that with each other, ways with names like  Nonviolent Communication, Active Listening, Empathic Listening, Mindful Listening.  I can’t say a lot about these, because I don’t practice any of them in a formal sense myself, but I like to think I’ve benefited from what exposure I’ve had to them, as well as other practices I have been involved in.

In summation, it’s easy to be in solidarity with people for a few weeks or months of struggle.  The tricky part is keeping the bonds of affection alive through years of changes,.  Sooner or later, we will show each other our worst, in spite of our best intentions . Can we keep looking each other in the eye through that?  The changes I see happening in the mid to long-term future are going to shrink the world each of us inhabits.  At some point, the internet will go down, and we will lose all our “Facebook Friends,” except for the ones who are actually part of our daily lives. To build a graceful future, we will need to really be friends with each other, and not withdraw from each other forever at the first sign of anger, selfishness, or foolishness.  It’s certainly not always easy; but I have seen the alternative, and it doesn’t work very well. The bioregional movement provides a coherent vision of a sane future, but it takes more than ideals to keep a movement together.  It takes the work of consistently caring about and connecting with other people.  That, in the end, is what will make or break our revolution.

That’s what I said, to an audience of about a dozen people, in a room whose acoustics were awful.  I’m not sure how much my audience actually heard.  One young woman apparently misheard my message and used up most of our discussion time accusing me of being a Luddite.  I’m not a Luddite–I love technology, I’m even dependent on it in more ways than I’d like to be, because I’m not sure how much longer we are going to be able to maintain this amazing, magical web of complexity.

The strongest energy at the teach-in came from the mostly young people who were there in association with Occupy Nashville.  Their main meeting at the teach in was held in the same acoustically-impaired room I had talked in, so I stayed there and, with some difficulty, observed the way they took care of business.  I was impressed–they seemed much more organized and balanced than the wild, passionate SDS meetings I remember from the 60′s.  It’s reassuring to have a sense that the younger generation is, in some ways, an improvement on the older one.  Here’s a music break, and then I’ll talk more about the “Occupy” movement.

music:  Steve Earle, “Amerika v.6.0″





OCCUPY EVERYWHERE

15 10 2011

I have a cousin who used to work for the World Bank, back in the day when most people thought highly of that institution.  His specialty was bringing potable water into urban neighborhoods in Africa, which is a noble pursuit, in my opinion.  My cousin has a good understanding of “the big picture,” and thus it was that he asked me a question, thirty years ago, that still rings in my ears, because it seems more and more relevant.  We were talking about The Farm, which at the time was a bustling and vigorous community of 1500 dedicated spiritual and cultural revolutionaries and our children.  The question my cousin asked me was this:  “What are you doing to make sure the younger generation has ways to fit in and take responsibility?”  At the time, his query brought me up short–I didn’t know what to tell him.

The question about the Farm became moot in just a few short years as the community imploded, scattering most of its young–and old–members far and wide.  Reduced now to a much more manageable population of a couple of hundred (at 1500 residents, our population density, and ecological problems, were on a par with Bangladesh), the community seems to be making the transition from one generation to the next fairly gracefully.  But that’s not what I’m here to talk about right now.

What I’m here to talk about is that somebody should have asked my cousin’s question–”what’s in it for the next generation?”– to the vast array of politicians, business “leaders,” and Wall Street banksters who have systematically dismantled this country for their own benefit.  They have saddled young people with enormous debts for their education–debts which, for most, cannot be shed through bankruptcy–while at the same time they have eliminated the jobs that could have paid back those loans.

The election of Barack Obama–who has turned out to be a Trojan Horse for the banksters and  other forces of greed and repression in this country–served to destroy young peoples’ faith in the political process. The unemployed and unneeded are refusing to accept the Republican idea that it’s somehow their own fault that they have been dealt out of the economy, There is nothing left for them to do but take it  to the streets–they rightfully feel that they have nothing left to lose, but everything to gain.

And the banksters have good reason to be nervous.  Everybody knows they’ve ripped off everybody, including the police on whom they are depending for defense against the mob.  The army?  The army is full of young people who joined because they couldn’t find a job anywhere else.  They have plenty of grounds for sympathy with the protests–indeed, many veterans are joining the protests.  And everyone in the military is aware of the increasingly shoddy treatment of disabled veterans.  Even the army could get shaky.  Polls show that, unlike the “Tea Party,” a majority of Americans support the Occupiers.

The biggest complaint heard about this movement is that its demands are not clear–that the manifesto issued by Occupy Wall Street wanders all over the place.  In my opinion, the same charge could be leveled at America’s Declaration of Independence.  If i had time, I’d compare the two–maybe next month.  What is happening here is a truly populist, bottom-up driven movement that is still finding its voice, as it rises up against a system that may be too far gone for mere reform.

As an aging counterculturalist, I feel both happy and sad when I see what’s going on in America now.  I feel happy because the Occupy movement is so much more widespread and appreciated than the efforts of my generation.  We have been warning of the dangers of unfettered aggression, greed, and growth for decades, and we have been ridiculed, trivialized, or ignored, while things just got worse and worse.  I feel sad because the desire for rootedness and self-sufficiency that drove my generation to “occupy” the back country is not really an option for this wave of our movement, at this point.  In the East, the forests have been clearcut and the mountain tops removed, while the West has been despoiled by oil seekers and the vacation homes of the1%.  Land is too expensive, time is too short, and the social regulatory mechanisms are still too controlling for this new generation to take the rural, communal route to freedom that my generation traveled.   But the money and the regulations will fade away over the next decade or two, and the land will fall into the hands of those who can–occupy it.   Not only is a saner future possible, it seems to be a-borning.

music:  Gogol Bordello, “Rebellious Love








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.